Oppose rather interesting but technicaly poor. Overexposed, grainy, theres some dust, tilted, as well as reflections on the glass of the buildings. I haven't ever experienced that myself in night shooting and I would never usually shoot with a polorizer at night but is this case it would have been useful. -
Fcb98103:56, 8 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose Busy composition, I don't think the motion blurred lights are a benefit at all, the flares around bright lights are kinda distracting. What I do like is way the image is painted in light on a dark canvas.
Shoeshirt17:45, 8 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose Very striking night pic. However, as mentioned above, the pic suffers from some technical problems and isn't very encyclopedic. Sorry. Jumpingcheese12:38, 14 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose rather interesting but technicaly poor. Overexposed, grainy, theres some dust, tilted, as well as reflections on the glass of the buildings. I haven't ever experienced that myself in night shooting and I would never usually shoot with a polorizer at night but is this case it would have been useful. -
Fcb98103:56, 8 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose Busy composition, I don't think the motion blurred lights are a benefit at all, the flares around bright lights are kinda distracting. What I do like is way the image is painted in light on a dark canvas.
Shoeshirt17:45, 8 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose Very striking night pic. However, as mentioned above, the pic suffers from some technical problems and isn't very encyclopedic. Sorry. Jumpingcheese12:38, 14 June 2007 (UTC)reply