Sanity has returned to my world knowing that the tiny image was a clerical error. I remove my vote and now abstain from the issue.
Vicarious04:02, 24 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment. The image's resolution is actually 1908x1026 px. Perhaps there was a software bug that resulted in the previous revision being displayed? --
KFP (
talk |
contribs)
14:09, 23 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Neutral. The size has been shown not to be an issue, but this image would be much clearer head-on, or at only a slight tilt. Anyone want to make a replacement?
Stephen Turner (
Talk)
14:47, 23 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Sanity has returned to my world knowing that the tiny image was a clerical error. I remove my vote and now abstain from the issue.
Vicarious04:02, 24 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment. The image's resolution is actually 1908x1026 px. Perhaps there was a software bug that resulted in the previous revision being displayed? --
KFP (
talk |
contribs)
14:09, 23 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Neutral. The size has been shown not to be an issue, but this image would be much clearer head-on, or at only a slight tilt. Anyone want to make a replacement?
Stephen Turner (
Talk)
14:47, 23 November 2006 (UTC)reply