Support as nominator —
True ozzy 10:51, 26 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose - I wouldn't want to see this on the WP front page - and the still picture is only 200 px wide, so it (er, the photo ;-) isn't big enough. Sure, WP isn't censored, but still... In the article it is OK, since those who search for it know what they're looking for. --
Janke |
Talk 16:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose and this should be closed. For something almost 50% of the adult population can do I think we can manage a technically better picture. Iff that happens then we can get into a serious discussion about the main page... but for now this picture is merely a joke.
grenグレン 16:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose and delist as vandalism - user has vandalised WP before, image fails every single criterion and yes, I know about AGF but I think we have enough evidence to show that this is not a serious nom. Anyway, an image on the bad images list couldn't be shown on the main page. If, however the user submitted a high quality diagram of the ejaculation process (or animated diagram) then we would consider. —
Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 17:55, 26 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Support as nominator —
True ozzy 10:51, 26 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose - I wouldn't want to see this on the WP front page - and the still picture is only 200 px wide, so it (er, the photo ;-) isn't big enough. Sure, WP isn't censored, but still... In the article it is OK, since those who search for it know what they're looking for. --
Janke |
Talk 16:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose and this should be closed. For something almost 50% of the adult population can do I think we can manage a technically better picture. Iff that happens then we can get into a serious discussion about the main page... but for now this picture is merely a joke.
grenグレン 16:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose and delist as vandalism - user has vandalised WP before, image fails every single criterion and yes, I know about AGF but I think we have enough evidence to show that this is not a serious nom. Anyway, an image on the bad images list couldn't be shown on the main page. If, however the user submitted a high quality diagram of the ejaculation process (or animated diagram) then we would consider. —
Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 17:55, 26 April 2007 (UTC)reply