- Reason
- Large, good quality photochrom file from approximately 110 years ago showing two peddlers selling milk from a dogcart. The proportions of the cart and its harness are clearly depicted, as is the act of selling milk in this historic setting near Brussels, Belgium. Restored version of Image:Dogcart.jpg.
- Articles this image appears in
- Dogcart, Peddler
- Creator
- Detroit Publishing Co.
- Support as nominator -- Durova Charge! 07:32, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Can anything be done about the darkening in the upper right corner?
Spikebrennan (
talk)
13:50, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Which area specifically do you mean? Durova Charge! 16:55, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- The sky and the grassy area to the right of the dirt path. They darken towards the right edge of the image, which I'm guessing is damage to the original rather than the way the original was originally printed. Support edit 1 Spikebrennan ( talk) 23:11, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support. High encyclopedic value for its uses in Dogcart and Peddler, and a lovely image. It's amazing how similar in style and subject a lot of photochroms are to paintings of the same time period.-- ragesoss ( talk) 21:59, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support Edit 1 fascinating image. Becky Sayles ( talk) 00:51, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support The image is almost too beautiful for the articles in which it appears. Fletcher ( talk) 19:38, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support I really like this picture.-- Filll ( talk | wpc) 19:57, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support Edit 1. Wonderful! :bloodofox: ( talk) 07:39, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose for weak composition. Greener Cactus ( talk) 20:11, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Support Edit 1. It's a very nice and encyclopedic image, but I can't give it my full support because I feel the darkening image hasn't been addressed enough, especially in the lower right of the image. The path also gets darker, but the edit didn't change that at all. However, this could merely be shadows or something, so I can't oppose on those grounds. Nautica Shad es 22:12, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. I have trouble believing the colour of the milk containers (and the hats, for that matter, but the milk containers are a more central subject). For me, this image treads an uneasy ground between artwork and photography, and I think that message needs to be clear in the captions in all articles - that the colours are likely inaccurate. We unambiguously label all other artwork and false colour images in the captions afaik. Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 10:09, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support this image is also on the photochrom page. Intothewoods29 ( talk) 22:36, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Promoted Image:Dogcart3.jpg MER-C 07:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- Reason
- Large, good quality photochrom file from approximately 110 years ago showing two peddlers selling milk from a dogcart. The proportions of the cart and its harness are clearly depicted, as is the act of selling milk in this historic setting near Brussels, Belgium. Restored version of Image:Dogcart.jpg.
- Articles this image appears in
- Dogcart, Peddler
- Creator
- Detroit Publishing Co.
- Support as nominator -- Durova Charge! 07:32, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Can anything be done about the darkening in the upper right corner?
Spikebrennan (
talk)
13:50, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Which area specifically do you mean? Durova Charge! 16:55, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- The sky and the grassy area to the right of the dirt path. They darken towards the right edge of the image, which I'm guessing is damage to the original rather than the way the original was originally printed. Support edit 1 Spikebrennan ( talk) 23:11, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support. High encyclopedic value for its uses in Dogcart and Peddler, and a lovely image. It's amazing how similar in style and subject a lot of photochroms are to paintings of the same time period.-- ragesoss ( talk) 21:59, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support Edit 1 fascinating image. Becky Sayles ( talk) 00:51, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support The image is almost too beautiful for the articles in which it appears. Fletcher ( talk) 19:38, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support I really like this picture.-- Filll ( talk | wpc) 19:57, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support Edit 1. Wonderful! :bloodofox: ( talk) 07:39, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose for weak composition. Greener Cactus ( talk) 20:11, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Support Edit 1. It's a very nice and encyclopedic image, but I can't give it my full support because I feel the darkening image hasn't been addressed enough, especially in the lower right of the image. The path also gets darker, but the edit didn't change that at all. However, this could merely be shadows or something, so I can't oppose on those grounds. Nautica Shad es 22:12, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. I have trouble believing the colour of the milk containers (and the hats, for that matter, but the milk containers are a more central subject). For me, this image treads an uneasy ground between artwork and photography, and I think that message needs to be clear in the captions in all articles - that the colours are likely inaccurate. We unambiguously label all other artwork and false colour images in the captions afaik. Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 10:09, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support this image is also on the photochrom page. Intothewoods29 ( talk) 22:36, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Promoted Image:Dogcart3.jpg MER-C 07:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)