Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2011 at 14:57:36 (UTC)
Reason
The image is of sufficiently high resolution and quality, as well as free to use (the label, although trademarked, is not copyrighted). The
previous nomination closed as no consensus. It is the leading image in our article about the reaction, and is in several other related articles, showing the encyclopedic nature of the image.
Oppose I don't see aything special about this image at all. The background is horrific and very distracting. The focus is not perfect. This could easily be redone to a much higher standard.
JFitch(talk)01:19, 24 September 2011 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Something about this, be it the lighting, background or whatever, gives the false impression that this is a very old photograph. It just doesn't look right to me.
J Milburn (
talk)
08:11, 24 September 2011 (UTC)reply
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2011 at 14:57:36 (UTC)
Reason
The image is of sufficiently high resolution and quality, as well as free to use (the label, although trademarked, is not copyrighted). The
previous nomination closed as no consensus. It is the leading image in our article about the reaction, and is in several other related articles, showing the encyclopedic nature of the image.
Oppose I don't see aything special about this image at all. The background is horrific and very distracting. The focus is not perfect. This could easily be redone to a much higher standard.
JFitch(talk)01:19, 24 September 2011 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Something about this, be it the lighting, background or whatever, gives the false impression that this is a very old photograph. It just doesn't look right to me.
J Milburn (
talk)
08:11, 24 September 2011 (UTC)reply