Question Is the image soft? The slight diffusion makes the image seem really bright. btw you're misisng an FP category in your nomination above. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 20:08, 25 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Oppose Licensing looks off for FP?
Saffron Blaze (
talk) 11:46, 26 April 2013 (UTC)reply
On Commons. Did we reach an agreement here? —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 06:36, 27 April 2013 (UTC)reply
License is fine as the discussion was closed without a consensus but the file res in this case isnt --
Muhammad(talk) 16:37, 27 April 2013 (UTC)reply
The license is quite uselss for any purposes; but I bet it (the combined CC BY-NC, especially) attracts many friendly supports. :)
JKadavoorJee 05:24, 28 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Oppose License, and size. — raekyt 06:44, 29 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Actually that is a categorically incorrect statement:
[1]. As it stands 2/3 of the oppose !votes would be struck by the closer for invalid
rationale --
Fir0002 08:17, 4 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Question Is the image soft? The slight diffusion makes the image seem really bright. btw you're misisng an FP category in your nomination above. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 20:08, 25 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Oppose Licensing looks off for FP?
Saffron Blaze (
talk) 11:46, 26 April 2013 (UTC)reply
On Commons. Did we reach an agreement here? —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 06:36, 27 April 2013 (UTC)reply
License is fine as the discussion was closed without a consensus but the file res in this case isnt --
Muhammad(talk) 16:37, 27 April 2013 (UTC)reply
The license is quite uselss for any purposes; but I bet it (the combined CC BY-NC, especially) attracts many friendly supports. :)
JKadavoorJee 05:24, 28 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Oppose License, and size. — raekyt 06:44, 29 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Actually that is a categorically incorrect statement:
[1]. As it stands 2/3 of the oppose !votes would be struck by the closer for invalid
rationale --
Fir0002 08:17, 4 May 2013 (UTC)reply