Support as nominator — > Animum < 00:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Support - Very enc; you can really see the nature of these rays as light and shadow. Plus pretty. Some technical issues, but not enough to kill it. --
TotoBaggins 01:22, 17 June 2007 (UTC)reply
oppose grainy and out of focus compared to other examples on that page. I don't think the fact that the rays radiate in all directions makes up for the technical issues, as it doesn't add that much enc to the image.
Debivort 02:27, 17 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose The thunbnail looks wonderful, but the more I expand it the more the lack of focus ruins it for me.
Cacophony 04:20, 17 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose That is very very very heavily blown... --
antilivedT |
C |
G 04:39, 17 June 2007 (UTC)reply
I personaly think that it is exposed perfectly for such a high contrast scene. If you take a look at the histagram, you'll see equal clipping on both the highlights and shadows. But tastes vary. oh and Oppose due to sharpness and grainyness -
Fcb981 04:48, 17 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Because the subject is the rays, I would expose this perhaps half - 1 full stop less and have a darker background. But I guess taste varies. --
antilivedT |
C |
G 07:49, 18 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose - As above and I don't like the centered composition. For a picture with little enc relevance, beauty and technical quality should be outstanding, which are not.
Alvesgaspar 09:07, 17 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose Grainy and out of focus. -
Wutschwlllm 11:55, 17 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose Bad quality.
8thstar 00:25, 18 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Support A very nice picture of a rare all sky crepuscular rays with the beautiful sunset and iridescent colors. The picture represents the subject very well and has a higher resolution than most of the other pictures at the same
page. --
Mbz1 22:27, 18 June 2007 (UTC)Mbz1reply
It has lower effective resolution though, because it is out of focus.
Debivort 15:40, 19 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose But I'm borderline. It's too grainy at full view, but it's very pretty. If it could be touched up somehow I would reverse my vote because it's such a great image.
Arius Maximus 17:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Not promoted --
Raven4x4x 05:35, 26 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Support as nominator — > Animum < 00:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Support - Very enc; you can really see the nature of these rays as light and shadow. Plus pretty. Some technical issues, but not enough to kill it. --
TotoBaggins 01:22, 17 June 2007 (UTC)reply
oppose grainy and out of focus compared to other examples on that page. I don't think the fact that the rays radiate in all directions makes up for the technical issues, as it doesn't add that much enc to the image.
Debivort 02:27, 17 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose The thunbnail looks wonderful, but the more I expand it the more the lack of focus ruins it for me.
Cacophony 04:20, 17 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose That is very very very heavily blown... --
antilivedT |
C |
G 04:39, 17 June 2007 (UTC)reply
I personaly think that it is exposed perfectly for such a high contrast scene. If you take a look at the histagram, you'll see equal clipping on both the highlights and shadows. But tastes vary. oh and Oppose due to sharpness and grainyness -
Fcb981 04:48, 17 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Because the subject is the rays, I would expose this perhaps half - 1 full stop less and have a darker background. But I guess taste varies. --
antilivedT |
C |
G 07:49, 18 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose - As above and I don't like the centered composition. For a picture with little enc relevance, beauty and technical quality should be outstanding, which are not.
Alvesgaspar 09:07, 17 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose Grainy and out of focus. -
Wutschwlllm 11:55, 17 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose Bad quality.
8thstar 00:25, 18 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Support A very nice picture of a rare all sky crepuscular rays with the beautiful sunset and iridescent colors. The picture represents the subject very well and has a higher resolution than most of the other pictures at the same
page. --
Mbz1 22:27, 18 June 2007 (UTC)Mbz1reply
It has lower effective resolution though, because it is out of focus.
Debivort 15:40, 19 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose But I'm borderline. It's too grainy at full view, but it's very pretty. If it could be touched up somehow I would reverse my vote because it's such a great image.
Arius Maximus 17:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Not promoted --
Raven4x4x 05:35, 26 June 2007 (UTC)reply