Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2012 at 12:54:49 (UTC)
- Reason
- I display here and above two good pictures of Colorada Lake, both of them have high EV and contirbute to the article in a different way. This one is a good panorama of great quality, showing well the surroundings of the lake, and also displaying its unique coloration, its fauna (flamingos, although displayed in the other picture in a more obvious way) and flora ( Stipa ichu).
- Articles in which this image appears
- Colorada Lake
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama
- Creator
- Chmehl
- Support as nominator -- Tomer T ( talk) 12:54, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- Support, quite striking panoramic landscape shot, displaying the notable aspects of the natural phenomenon, including both the depth and key surrounding visage. — Cirt ( talk) 18:48, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Great picture. I believe the EV would be increased considerable if
this picture were removed from the article. While it contributes a fair amount of EV, the article doesn't seem big enough to support three pictures.
Dusty
777
22:33, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- You're probably right. The picture you linked to didn't contribute that much to the article (it did demonstrated the red color of the lake, but two pictures are sufficient), and mostly created graphic overload. Hence I removed it. Tomer T ( talk) 01:16, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
- Support Per removal of the other picture from the article. The other picture didn't have the quality that this one does. The added EV is excellent! Dusty 777 02:17, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
- Support Samsara ( FA • FP) 17:30, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- Support JKadavoor Jee 09:00, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Promoted File:Laguna Colorada MC.jpg -- Jujutacular ( talk) 19:57, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2012 at 12:54:49 (UTC)
- Reason
- I display here and above two good pictures of Colorada Lake, both of them have high EV and contirbute to the article in a different way. This one is a good panorama of great quality, showing well the surroundings of the lake, and also displaying its unique coloration, its fauna (flamingos, although displayed in the other picture in a more obvious way) and flora ( Stipa ichu).
- Articles in which this image appears
- Colorada Lake
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama
- Creator
- Chmehl
- Support as nominator -- Tomer T ( talk) 12:54, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- Support, quite striking panoramic landscape shot, displaying the notable aspects of the natural phenomenon, including both the depth and key surrounding visage. — Cirt ( talk) 18:48, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Great picture. I believe the EV would be increased considerable if
this picture were removed from the article. While it contributes a fair amount of EV, the article doesn't seem big enough to support three pictures.
Dusty
777
22:33, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- You're probably right. The picture you linked to didn't contribute that much to the article (it did demonstrated the red color of the lake, but two pictures are sufficient), and mostly created graphic overload. Hence I removed it. Tomer T ( talk) 01:16, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
- Support Per removal of the other picture from the article. The other picture didn't have the quality that this one does. The added EV is excellent! Dusty 777 02:17, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
- Support Samsara ( FA • FP) 17:30, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- Support JKadavoor Jee 09:00, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Promoted File:Laguna Colorada MC.jpg -- Jujutacular ( talk) 19:57, 18 November 2012 (UTC)