Cochineal
_04_ies.jpg)
- Reason
- Great macro, and a type of insect form that gets neglected. For that matter, how about some isopod FPCs? You know, pillbugs?
- Articles this image appears in
- Cochineal
- Creator
- Frank Vincentz
- Support as nominator -- Shoemaker's Holiday ( talk) 04:34, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Question Are the feeding on an Opuntia? -- KP Botany ( talk) 10:16, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- That's the only genus they feed on, so yes. Shoemaker's Holiday ( talk) 14:49, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Then how about put it in the Cochineal section of Opuntia. I'm no good at formatting images in articles. Thx. After which I support purely for its EV. Not the greatest picture, but it tells a huge story we're not telling here otherwise. -- KP Botany ( talk) 20:03, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose. An interesting subject but not one that is described at all well by the photo. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 14:12, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
No quorum Not promoted --~ ωαdεstεr16 «talk stalk» 17:14, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Cochineal
- Reason
- Great macro, and a type of insect form that gets neglected. For that matter, how about some isopod FPCs? You know, pillbugs?
- Articles this image appears in
- Cochineal
- Creator
- Frank Vincentz
- Support as nominator -- Shoemaker's Holiday ( talk) 04:34, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Question Are the feeding on an Opuntia? -- KP Botany ( talk) 10:16, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- That's the only genus they feed on, so yes. Shoemaker's Holiday ( talk) 14:49, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Then how about put it in the Cochineal section of Opuntia. I'm no good at formatting images in articles. Thx. After which I support purely for its EV. Not the greatest picture, but it tells a huge story we're not telling here otherwise. -- KP Botany ( talk) 20:03, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose. An interesting subject but not one that is described at all well by the photo. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 14:12, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
No quorum Not promoted --~ ωαdεstεr16 «talk stalk» 17:14, 17 April 2009 (UTC)