Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2014 at 16:28:27 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality and good EV
- Articles in which this image appears
- City Observatory
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Creator
- Kadellar
- Support as nominator – Tomer T ( talk) 16:28, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment — Unique structure with an interesting history. Does Banquo's ghost lurk there after dark? Sca ( talk) 18:34, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - That tree is distracting. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 10:06, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- It's possible to crop out all but the smallest branches, but that cuts the size to below minimum. Sca ( talk) 15:34, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support - I think a building without surrounding natural elements makes for a stark photo. The winding, upward-sloping path, and to a certain extent also the tree off to the left, make it clear that the building is at the top of a hill. CorinneSD ( talk) 20:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support That the criteria of being substantially important to the subject article is met is without question. Overall well done, and I am OK with the tree. Jus da fax 03:47, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- -- The Herald : here I am 14:26, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - I agree with Crisco about that tree being distracting - not because it is there - but because of the big volume of it. It is taking up to much place in the picture compared with the buildning. It would benefit of a just little slight cropping - only some pixels - the left side. Hafspajen ( talk) 15:35, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- I don't find the branches all that distracting — as common objects they're a sort of visual archetype — but I would suggest reshooting in larger format with somewhat tighter crop. Still an interesting subject.
Sca (
talk)
17:43, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- That is what I am saying, a tighter crop. On the left side. Hafspajen ( talk) 08:22, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- I don't find the branches all that distracting — as common objects they're a sort of visual archetype — but I would suggest reshooting in larger format with somewhat tighter crop. Still an interesting subject.
Sca (
talk)
17:43, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Not Promoted -- Armbrust The Homunculus 16:35, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Not enough support for promotion. Armbrust The Homunculus 16:35, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2014 at 16:28:27 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality and good EV
- Articles in which this image appears
- City Observatory
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Creator
- Kadellar
- Support as nominator – Tomer T ( talk) 16:28, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment — Unique structure with an interesting history. Does Banquo's ghost lurk there after dark? Sca ( talk) 18:34, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - That tree is distracting. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 10:06, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- It's possible to crop out all but the smallest branches, but that cuts the size to below minimum. Sca ( talk) 15:34, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support - I think a building without surrounding natural elements makes for a stark photo. The winding, upward-sloping path, and to a certain extent also the tree off to the left, make it clear that the building is at the top of a hill. CorinneSD ( talk) 20:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support That the criteria of being substantially important to the subject article is met is without question. Overall well done, and I am OK with the tree. Jus da fax 03:47, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- -- The Herald : here I am 14:26, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - I agree with Crisco about that tree being distracting - not because it is there - but because of the big volume of it. It is taking up to much place in the picture compared with the buildning. It would benefit of a just little slight cropping - only some pixels - the left side. Hafspajen ( talk) 15:35, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- I don't find the branches all that distracting — as common objects they're a sort of visual archetype — but I would suggest reshooting in larger format with somewhat tighter crop. Still an interesting subject.
Sca (
talk)
17:43, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- That is what I am saying, a tighter crop. On the left side. Hafspajen ( talk) 08:22, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- I don't find the branches all that distracting — as common objects they're a sort of visual archetype — but I would suggest reshooting in larger format with somewhat tighter crop. Still an interesting subject.
Sca (
talk)
17:43, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Not Promoted -- Armbrust The Homunculus 16:35, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Not enough support for promotion. Armbrust The Homunculus 16:35, 18 December 2014 (UTC)