_(B%26W).jpg)
- Reason
- A high resoultion image with an obviously significant historical value.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Yalta Conference
- Creator
- US Signal Corps
- Support as nominator -- Sir Richardson ( talk) 17:19, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Reluctant oppose. Tremendous encyclopedic value, but substantial technical shortcomings. Durova 412 20:59, 20 March 2010 (UTC)- Support with comments: please upload radical changes under a new filename while nominations are underway, or else please notify people at user talk who have already reviewed. Durova 412 00:35, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Opposeper Durova. Jujutacular T · C 01:25, 21 March 2010 (UTC) (Support new picture below)- Oppose I'm moderately sure that I've seen better pictures of the trio. Noodle snacks ( talk) 06:50, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Hey, what about this one which actually is high resolution, unlike this nom. Has a few scratches but doesn't look that bad. There is a similar color photo at Yalta Conference but it's even smaller than the nom. Fletcher ( talk) 15:24, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- I would definitely support that one, it's iconic. But it might need a separate nomination. Different conference, different year. Jujutacular T · C 18:21, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Nomination reworded with new picture. Sir Richardson ( talk) 19:32, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support new picture. I'd even say make this image the lead at Yalta Conference. Jujutacular T · C 22:13, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Whoa What happened here?? Makeemlighter ( talk) 22:46, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Sir Richardson changed out the picture. Perhaps this would be better closed, and restarted with the new image. Jujutacular T · C 23:00, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I see that now. I agree. This should be closed and a new nomination created. At the very least, the comments from earlier should be struck. Makeemlighter ( talk) 04:48, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Comment: the new image was nominated previously here. -- Avenue ( talk) 23:20, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support It is one-of-a-kind image that deserves to get FP status IMO.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 16:08, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- Strong support per Mbz1. Ultra-rare photo -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Resolution is nice, but
Jalta-confer.jpg is in color, with much smaller resolution. I'd like an FP of this iconic shot but this isn't it.
HereToHelp (
talk to me)
19:45, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- Did they HAVE colour photography back then, and, if so, was it in fact used for this image, or is the colour version just a hand-tinting for a magazine or the like? Shoemaker's Holiday talk 12:29, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Promoted File:Yalta Conference (Churchill, Roosevelt, Stalin) (B&W).jpg — Maedin\ talk 20:25, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- Reason
- A high resoultion image with an obviously significant historical value.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Yalta Conference
- Creator
- US Signal Corps
- Support as nominator -- Sir Richardson ( talk) 17:19, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Reluctant oppose. Tremendous encyclopedic value, but substantial technical shortcomings. Durova 412 20:59, 20 March 2010 (UTC)- Support with comments: please upload radical changes under a new filename while nominations are underway, or else please notify people at user talk who have already reviewed. Durova 412 00:35, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Opposeper Durova. Jujutacular T · C 01:25, 21 March 2010 (UTC) (Support new picture below)- Oppose I'm moderately sure that I've seen better pictures of the trio. Noodle snacks ( talk) 06:50, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Hey, what about this one which actually is high resolution, unlike this nom. Has a few scratches but doesn't look that bad. There is a similar color photo at Yalta Conference but it's even smaller than the nom. Fletcher ( talk) 15:24, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- I would definitely support that one, it's iconic. But it might need a separate nomination. Different conference, different year. Jujutacular T · C 18:21, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Nomination reworded with new picture. Sir Richardson ( talk) 19:32, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support new picture. I'd even say make this image the lead at Yalta Conference. Jujutacular T · C 22:13, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Whoa What happened here?? Makeemlighter ( talk) 22:46, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Sir Richardson changed out the picture. Perhaps this would be better closed, and restarted with the new image. Jujutacular T · C 23:00, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I see that now. I agree. This should be closed and a new nomination created. At the very least, the comments from earlier should be struck. Makeemlighter ( talk) 04:48, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Comment: the new image was nominated previously here. -- Avenue ( talk) 23:20, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support It is one-of-a-kind image that deserves to get FP status IMO.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 16:08, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- Strong support per Mbz1. Ultra-rare photo -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Resolution is nice, but
Jalta-confer.jpg is in color, with much smaller resolution. I'd like an FP of this iconic shot but this isn't it.
HereToHelp (
talk to me)
19:45, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- Did they HAVE colour photography back then, and, if so, was it in fact used for this image, or is the colour version just a hand-tinting for a magazine or the like? Shoemaker's Holiday talk 12:29, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Promoted File:Yalta Conference (Churchill, Roosevelt, Stalin) (B&W).jpg — Maedin\ talk 20:25, 30 March 2010 (UTC)