Chinese Rite Controversy
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 May 2013 at 06:24:40 (UTC)
- Reason
- High Ev as lead image, very good quality especially for age
- Articles in which this image appears
- Chinese Rite controversy, etc.
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/Others
- Creator
- Athanasius Kircher
- Support as nominator -- Spongie555 ( talk) 06:24, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 16:26, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Could you explain the EV a bit better. What is the importance of Xu Guangqi in particular? JJ Harrison ( talk) 02:21, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support Mediran ( t • c) 09:56, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- Comment / Conditional Support Do you think that the lower right hand corner is a result of the paper not lying flat (or paper shrinkage from drying out, or the like), or is that just how it is in the original? If the consensus is this is original, consider this a support. Also, should we remove the large stain, or adjust the somewhat odd colouration, or?
- I'm honestly not sure how best to treat this one. =) Adam Cuerden ( talk) 11:12, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Not Promoted -- — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 23:42, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Chinese Rite Controversy
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 May 2013 at 06:24:40 (UTC)
- Reason
- High Ev as lead image, very good quality especially for age
- Articles in which this image appears
- Chinese Rite controversy, etc.
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/Others
- Creator
- Athanasius Kircher
- Support as nominator -- Spongie555 ( talk) 06:24, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 16:26, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Could you explain the EV a bit better. What is the importance of Xu Guangqi in particular? JJ Harrison ( talk) 02:21, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support Mediran ( t • c) 09:56, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- Comment / Conditional Support Do you think that the lower right hand corner is a result of the paper not lying flat (or paper shrinkage from drying out, or the like), or is that just how it is in the original? If the consensus is this is original, consider this a support. Also, should we remove the large stain, or adjust the somewhat odd colouration, or?
- I'm honestly not sure how best to treat this one. =) Adam Cuerden ( talk) 11:12, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Not Promoted -- — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 23:42, 6 May 2013 (UTC)