Chicago Michigan Avenue 1911
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2010 at 14:17:13 (UTC)
- Reason
- This is a unique depiction of a historic part of Chicago. It has high EV. This previously failed at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Chicago Michigan Avenue 1911 prior to restoration.
- Articles in which this image appears
-
Michigan Avenue (Chicago)
Historic Michigan Boulevard District - FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama
- Creator
- Copyright by Kaufmann, Weimer & Fabry Co, Chicago; restored by Smalljim ( talk · contribs) at the Graphics Lab
- Support as nominator -- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 14:17, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Slight opposealthough it might have some EV, the curvature is really distracting. Nergaal ( talk) 02:35, 2 October 2010 (UTC)- Support, tentatively, for its historical EV. There's bad curvature of field, but it's a century old panorama. How much are we expecting (or, can it be fixed?).
Fletcher (
talk)
00:05, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- If you want rectangular projection, there's a limit on how wide your panorama can be. Wide panoramas always require some curving in order to be projected into a 2D plane. Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 11:31, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Alternative
- Since some found the original too distorted, I've created this version with less curvature. Of course there are compensatory distortions at the edges, and the foreshore had to go, but I don't think the distortion is too bad in this case. — SMALL JIM 21:11, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support alternative.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 21:34, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral but if anything I would prefer the original. The alt appears much better, but when zooming on the bottom right or left corners, an awful distortion becomes obvious. Nergaal ( talk) 22:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, if you could tilt the image ~2 degrees and crop it just above the rail tracks, the distortion might be way less obvious.
Nergaal (
talk)
22:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Cropping above the rail tracks would not be beneficial to the project in terms of encyclopedic content. The trains going through the park is a part of the content that makes this image historical.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 04:02, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, if you could tilt the image ~2 degrees and crop it just above the rail tracks, the distortion might be way less obvious.
Nergaal (
talk)
22:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I think I'd stick with the original if the distortion can't be completely corrected. (My support !vote is above). Fletcher ( talk) 10:54, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Not promoted — Maedin\ talk 18:37, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Chicago Michigan Avenue 1911
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2010 at 14:17:13 (UTC)
- Reason
- This is a unique depiction of a historic part of Chicago. It has high EV. This previously failed at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Chicago Michigan Avenue 1911 prior to restoration.
- Articles in which this image appears
-
Michigan Avenue (Chicago)
Historic Michigan Boulevard District - FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama
- Creator
- Copyright by Kaufmann, Weimer & Fabry Co, Chicago; restored by Smalljim ( talk · contribs) at the Graphics Lab
- Support as nominator -- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 14:17, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Slight opposealthough it might have some EV, the curvature is really distracting. Nergaal ( talk) 02:35, 2 October 2010 (UTC)- Support, tentatively, for its historical EV. There's bad curvature of field, but it's a century old panorama. How much are we expecting (or, can it be fixed?).
Fletcher (
talk)
00:05, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- If you want rectangular projection, there's a limit on how wide your panorama can be. Wide panoramas always require some curving in order to be projected into a 2D plane. Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 11:31, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Alternative
- Since some found the original too distorted, I've created this version with less curvature. Of course there are compensatory distortions at the edges, and the foreshore had to go, but I don't think the distortion is too bad in this case. — SMALL JIM 21:11, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support alternative.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 21:34, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral but if anything I would prefer the original. The alt appears much better, but when zooming on the bottom right or left corners, an awful distortion becomes obvious. Nergaal ( talk) 22:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, if you could tilt the image ~2 degrees and crop it just above the rail tracks, the distortion might be way less obvious.
Nergaal (
talk)
22:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Cropping above the rail tracks would not be beneficial to the project in terms of encyclopedic content. The trains going through the park is a part of the content that makes this image historical.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 04:02, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, if you could tilt the image ~2 degrees and crop it just above the rail tracks, the distortion might be way less obvious.
Nergaal (
talk)
22:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I think I'd stick with the original if the distortion can't be completely corrected. (My support !vote is above). Fletcher ( talk) 10:54, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Not promoted — Maedin\ talk 18:37, 10 October 2010 (UTC)