Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 May 2022 at 19:48:03 (UTC)
Restored – A portrait of Cheoljong, the 25th monarch of Joseon. It was partly damaged in a fire of Yongdusan in Busan in 1954 and was restored in 1987.Original – The original is one of South Korea's National Treasures
Reason
A portrait of Cheoljong, the 25th monarch of Joseon. This is the only surviving royal portrait depicting King Cheoljong's physical appearance, as well as Joseon Era royal military attire; it was partly damaged in a fire of Yongdusan in Busan in 1954 and was restored in 1987
Comment I'm not sure this satifies
criterion number 2. Also, there's this
restoration restored copy that was uploaded by someone overwriting the original, if this one is available in sufficient resolution with a free license then imo it is a better image.
I think it will still fail
criterion number 2, it has to be at least 1,500 pixels in height and width. It is also not a restoration, as
Janke pointed out, but a copy (which would be OK imo if the resolution was good). The original, however, despite being partly destroyed, is historically significant enough to carry much encyclopaedic value, as evident from
this description. If the resolution of the original can be
as good as this, then I will happily support featuring the original.
UnpetitproleX (
talk)
14:16, 11 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Also, if it was destroyed in 1954, are there any pictures of it from before? Black and white? Those can be restored if they exist, by capable editors here such as @
Adam Cuerden: but the copy is a copy, and since it was made in 1987, are we sure it is in the public domain or under a free license?
UnpetitproleX (
talk)
14:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Honestly, that would be my worry, and it's going to depend on South Korean case law, which is quite beyond my expertise. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 7.8% of all
FPs16:44, 11 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose - Restored? That would imply that it contains part of the burned original, which it doesn't. It is a copy, not a restoration. --
Janke |
Talk13:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 May 2022 at 19:48:03 (UTC)
Restored – A portrait of Cheoljong, the 25th monarch of Joseon. It was partly damaged in a fire of Yongdusan in Busan in 1954 and was restored in 1987.Original – The original is one of South Korea's National Treasures
Reason
A portrait of Cheoljong, the 25th monarch of Joseon. This is the only surviving royal portrait depicting King Cheoljong's physical appearance, as well as Joseon Era royal military attire; it was partly damaged in a fire of Yongdusan in Busan in 1954 and was restored in 1987
Comment I'm not sure this satifies
criterion number 2. Also, there's this
restoration restored copy that was uploaded by someone overwriting the original, if this one is available in sufficient resolution with a free license then imo it is a better image.
I think it will still fail
criterion number 2, it has to be at least 1,500 pixels in height and width. It is also not a restoration, as
Janke pointed out, but a copy (which would be OK imo if the resolution was good). The original, however, despite being partly destroyed, is historically significant enough to carry much encyclopaedic value, as evident from
this description. If the resolution of the original can be
as good as this, then I will happily support featuring the original.
UnpetitproleX (
talk)
14:16, 11 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Also, if it was destroyed in 1954, are there any pictures of it from before? Black and white? Those can be restored if they exist, by capable editors here such as @
Adam Cuerden: but the copy is a copy, and since it was made in 1987, are we sure it is in the public domain or under a free license?
UnpetitproleX (
talk)
14:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Honestly, that would be my worry, and it's going to depend on South Korean case law, which is quite beyond my expertise. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 7.8% of all
FPs16:44, 11 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose - Restored? That would imply that it contains part of the burned original, which it doesn't. It is a copy, not a restoration. --
Janke |
Talk13:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC)reply