Chennai Chintadripet Metro Station
- Reason
- looks nice.
- Articles this image appears in
- Creator
- Jbritto
- Support as nominator -- Alokprasad84 ( talk) 12:51, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Too small, tilt, composition and "gah". No article and no indication what exactly it might be encyclopaedic for. Train is not particularly well depicted, and station is obscured by train, all we see is a monotony of bins, benches, platform, roof and signs. Maybe the roof is interesting. But this is not a good picture of the roof specifically. Speedy close? Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 14:06, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose The tilt is the killer. Clegs ( talk) 15:47, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Strong oppose Poor picture. Does not meet size requirements. Crassic! ( talk) 23:15, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose - not in any articles, "looks nice" is not a reason for FP, fails criteria 1, 2, 3 and 7. — Vanderdecken∴ ∫ ξ φ 07:17, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted MER-C 10:50, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Chennai Chintadripet Metro Station
- Reason
- looks nice.
- Articles this image appears in
- Creator
- Jbritto
- Support as nominator -- Alokprasad84 ( talk) 12:51, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Too small, tilt, composition and "gah". No article and no indication what exactly it might be encyclopaedic for. Train is not particularly well depicted, and station is obscured by train, all we see is a monotony of bins, benches, platform, roof and signs. Maybe the roof is interesting. But this is not a good picture of the roof specifically. Speedy close? Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 14:06, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose The tilt is the killer. Clegs ( talk) 15:47, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Strong oppose Poor picture. Does not meet size requirements. Crassic! ( talk) 23:15, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose - not in any articles, "looks nice" is not a reason for FP, fails criteria 1, 2, 3 and 7. — Vanderdecken∴ ∫ ξ φ 07:17, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted MER-C 10:50, 27 May 2008 (UTC)