Carterandsadat
Extremely historical image, represents one of the most profound moments in the struggle for peace between Israel and her neighbors. Also: excellent quality photo for its time and position (in brightly lit area); appears in the Camp David Accords, taken by the White House Press Photographer.
- Nominate and support. - AJ24 03:37, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Too small, not visually interesting. — Keenan Pepper 05:19, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
-
Oppose - Far too small. Please actually READ the
featured picture criteria before nominating an image, it prevents so many failed nominations. This picture is only 500×396 pixels, it should be at least double the size (biggest side has to be 1000px+) before it can even be considered for FP. —
Vanderdecken∴
∫
ξ
φ
09:38, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. Sorry for mistake... thought original photo was better resolution, quality... (But it is visually interesting). I agree to immediately remove the photo from the candidacy list. Thanks. AJ24 13:07, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Historical, yes. But not interesting, and extremely grainy. Cab02 14:41, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Too small so disobeys FPC rules - Adrian Pingstone 16:08, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Removed from Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates at the request of the nominator. — Vanderdecken∴ ∫ ξ φ 16:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Carterandsadat
Extremely historical image, represents one of the most profound moments in the struggle for peace between Israel and her neighbors. Also: excellent quality photo for its time and position (in brightly lit area); appears in the Camp David Accords, taken by the White House Press Photographer.
- Nominate and support. - AJ24 03:37, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Too small, not visually interesting. — Keenan Pepper 05:19, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
-
Oppose - Far too small. Please actually READ the
featured picture criteria before nominating an image, it prevents so many failed nominations. This picture is only 500×396 pixels, it should be at least double the size (biggest side has to be 1000px+) before it can even be considered for FP. —
Vanderdecken∴
∫
ξ
φ
09:38, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. Sorry for mistake... thought original photo was better resolution, quality... (But it is visually interesting). I agree to immediately remove the photo from the candidacy list. Thanks. AJ24 13:07, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Historical, yes. But not interesting, and extremely grainy. Cab02 14:41, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Too small so disobeys FPC rules - Adrian Pingstone 16:08, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Removed from Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates at the request of the nominator. — Vanderdecken∴ ∫ ξ φ 16:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC)