- Reason
- A good photograph of a difficult and dangerous exercise that displays the capabilities of two military craft.
- Articles this image appears in
- CH-47 Chinook, Virginia Capes, Rigid-hulled inflatable boat
- Creator
- MC3 Robyn Gerstenslager
- Support as nominator -- Durova Charge! 23:59, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
- Weak, Weak support It's noisy, and the picture's cut off, detracting from it's enc. in CH-47 Chinook. Also, it's use in Virginia Capes is pretty weak. Otherwise, for the picture's use in Rigid-hulled inflatable boat, I think it's pretty decent, so it's a weak support in that regard. Spencer T♦ C 00:20, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
- A propos of nothing, I wish I could find an upload-quality version of the Chinook stunt pictured here: [1] Spikebrennan ( talk) 14:16, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. Composition, cut-off subject, raft is in the shadows, hard to see what's going on. -- Dschwen 14:35, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support. Very cool! Clegs ( talk) 14:41, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose – parts of rotor blades and the tail top are cut off – Ilse @ 20:53, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Weak support - Dramatic, striking, good focus on the body of the helicopter - but Ilse and Dschwen bring up good points. Cirt ( talk) 19:02, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted - no consensus. -- jjron ( talk) 08:16, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Reason
- A good photograph of a difficult and dangerous exercise that displays the capabilities of two military craft.
- Articles this image appears in
- CH-47 Chinook, Virginia Capes, Rigid-hulled inflatable boat
- Creator
- MC3 Robyn Gerstenslager
- Support as nominator -- Durova Charge! 23:59, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
- Weak, Weak support It's noisy, and the picture's cut off, detracting from it's enc. in CH-47 Chinook. Also, it's use in Virginia Capes is pretty weak. Otherwise, for the picture's use in Rigid-hulled inflatable boat, I think it's pretty decent, so it's a weak support in that regard. Spencer T♦ C 00:20, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
- A propos of nothing, I wish I could find an upload-quality version of the Chinook stunt pictured here: [1] Spikebrennan ( talk) 14:16, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. Composition, cut-off subject, raft is in the shadows, hard to see what's going on. -- Dschwen 14:35, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support. Very cool! Clegs ( talk) 14:41, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose – parts of rotor blades and the tail top are cut off – Ilse @ 20:53, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Weak support - Dramatic, striking, good focus on the body of the helicopter - but Ilse and Dschwen bring up good points. Cirt ( talk) 19:02, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted - no consensus. -- jjron ( talk) 08:16, 29 August 2008 (UTC)