I don't think so. This is just a rather bad scan and thus most likely a copyright violation! Source self-made shows a misunderstanding of licensing policies. --
Dschwen14:37, 30 April 2008 (UTC)reply
Aside from the terrible quality, the thumb marks and light along the side indicate scan of an ad in a periodical and likely copyright infringement. Poor quality, breach of copyright, poor composition (likely due to the cropping of information around the border revealing where it came from).
Capital photographer (
talk)
14:43, 30 April 2008 (UTC)reply
The clearly visible
Moiré pattern in combination with the photo itself indeed indicate a scan of a professional
halftone print. Support speedy deletion as copyvio.
Dorftrottel (
criticise) 18:41,
April 30, 2008
I don't think so. This is just a rather bad scan and thus most likely a copyright violation! Source self-made shows a misunderstanding of licensing policies. --
Dschwen14:37, 30 April 2008 (UTC)reply
Aside from the terrible quality, the thumb marks and light along the side indicate scan of an ad in a periodical and likely copyright infringement. Poor quality, breach of copyright, poor composition (likely due to the cropping of information around the border revealing where it came from).
Capital photographer (
talk)
14:43, 30 April 2008 (UTC)reply
The clearly visible
Moiré pattern in combination with the photo itself indeed indicate a scan of a professional
halftone print. Support speedy deletion as copyvio.
Dorftrottel (
criticise) 18:41,
April 30, 2008