Bertha Lutz
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2016 at 03:52:50 (UTC)
- Reason
- A fine photograph of a notable Brazilian scientist, which is probably an underrepresented subject. Pose isn't perfect, but isn't bad.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Bertha Lutz
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
- Creator
- National Photo Company; restored by Adam Cuerden
- Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ( talk) 03:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support Quality is good for 1925. Pose is acceptable (heck, I thought this was in the 1950s at first glance) - — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 04:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support As per Crisco. -- Rainbow Archer ( talk) 10:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support – Good detail for the era. Rather artful composition. Sca ( talk) 14:00, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support – Jobas ( talk) 10:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Promoted File:Bertha Lutz 1925.jpg -- Armbrust The Homunculus 04:57, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Bertha Lutz
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2016 at 03:52:50 (UTC)
- Reason
- A fine photograph of a notable Brazilian scientist, which is probably an underrepresented subject. Pose isn't perfect, but isn't bad.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Bertha Lutz
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
- Creator
- National Photo Company; restored by Adam Cuerden
- Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ( talk) 03:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support Quality is good for 1925. Pose is acceptable (heck, I thought this was in the 1950s at first glance) - — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 04:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support As per Crisco. -- Rainbow Archer ( talk) 10:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support – Good detail for the era. Rather artful composition. Sca ( talk) 14:00, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support – Jobas ( talk) 10:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Promoted File:Bertha Lutz 1925.jpg -- Armbrust The Homunculus 04:57, 31 July 2016 (UTC)