Support as nominator – Hari Krishnan 04:17, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Comment Dizzying perspective... Should either have been shot with a
tilt-shift lens or been perspective-corrected in software. --
Janke |
Talk 07:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
OpposeNot used in any articles.MER-C 10:13, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
I still oppose this nomination for the noise.
MER-C 09:32, 6 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment Image added to articles.
Hari Krishnan 12:05, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose – Looks tilty and out of whack perspective-wise, perhaps because symmetrical tableau was shot a bit off-center.
Sca (
talk) 14:40, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment - Perspective corrected, uploaded over original. Revert if you don't like it. --
Janke |
Talk 16:46, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Support Great image, portrays the subdued dynamism inside a library, good colors, proper lighting, perspective correction looks good, good EV.
Kalart 22:33, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Struck !vote because the user doesn't meet the requirements. (Account wasn't registered 25 days ago and it didn't make 100 edits.)
ArmbrustTheHomunculus 02:13, 6 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose Quality is nothing like the current standard for interiors on Commons. Ceiling all grainy.
Charlesjsharp (
talk) 23:06, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Support alternate – I added an alternate edited version (denoised and pulled up the levels of darker areas). Pinging those who voted @
Hari Krishnan,
Janke,
MER-C,
Sca, and
Charlesjsharp:. Alternate image is a bit softer but still has good detail at full size.
Bammesk (
talk) 14:08, 10 November 2018 (UTC)reply
I think the alternative, while an improvement, is too soft to meet current standards.
MER-C 21:38, 10 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Support as nominator – Hari Krishnan 04:17, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Comment Dizzying perspective... Should either have been shot with a
tilt-shift lens or been perspective-corrected in software. --
Janke |
Talk 07:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
OpposeNot used in any articles.MER-C 10:13, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
I still oppose this nomination for the noise.
MER-C 09:32, 6 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment Image added to articles.
Hari Krishnan 12:05, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose – Looks tilty and out of whack perspective-wise, perhaps because symmetrical tableau was shot a bit off-center.
Sca (
talk) 14:40, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment - Perspective corrected, uploaded over original. Revert if you don't like it. --
Janke |
Talk 16:46, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Support Great image, portrays the subdued dynamism inside a library, good colors, proper lighting, perspective correction looks good, good EV.
Kalart 22:33, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Struck !vote because the user doesn't meet the requirements. (Account wasn't registered 25 days ago and it didn't make 100 edits.)
ArmbrustTheHomunculus 02:13, 6 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose Quality is nothing like the current standard for interiors on Commons. Ceiling all grainy.
Charlesjsharp (
talk) 23:06, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Support alternate – I added an alternate edited version (denoised and pulled up the levels of darker areas). Pinging those who voted @
Hari Krishnan,
Janke,
MER-C,
Sca, and
Charlesjsharp:. Alternate image is a bit softer but still has good detail at full size.
Bammesk (
talk) 14:08, 10 November 2018 (UTC)reply
I think the alternative, while an improvement, is too soft to meet current standards.
MER-C 21:38, 10 November 2018 (UTC)reply