- Reason
- Appealing and creative. It makes the reader want to click the picture to learn more.
- Articles this image appears in
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hallucinogenic_effects_of_banana_peels
- Creator
- User:Wallrus
- Support as nominator — Wallrus 04:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
* oppose and speedy close troll nomination.
Debivort
05:03, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- oppose an unappealing portrayal of a marginally unappealing subject. Composition is dull, there could be significantly more detail, particularly on the inside of the peel, and there is poor contrast against the table which has the same hue and detail as the peel. Debivort 05:59, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Very strong oppose Fails almost all FPC and doesn't appear in an article, automatic disqualification. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Clh288 ( talk • contribs).
- To be fair, it was recently added by the nominator to Bananadine. Obviously I otherwise agree with you. Debivort 06:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose Uh...No way. "It makes the reader want to click the picture to learn more." Hahaha, that was funny though. Wikipediarul e s 2221 06:50, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose, horrible nomination.-- Svetovid 08:10, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. Doesn't have appealing (pardon the pun) composition and having it on a brown floor while the peel is browning itself, doesn't make for good contrast. - Mgm| (talk) 08:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose. It's just too ugly and poorly composed. On a white background maybe... Theonlyedge 12:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
-
Oppose - troll. However, it does satisfy one criterion... it's high res! >.< The irony... —
Vanderdecken∴
∫
ξ
φ
17:17, 10 May 2007 (UTC) - Extremely Strong Oppose I don't think I need to explain my vote... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BeefRendang ( talk • contribs) 12:34, 11 May 2007 (UTC). J Are you green? 20:48, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Or sign it apparently. Debivort 17:17, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose I'll be blunt - 4 MB of wasted space. At the very least, a poorly composed, poorly set, reflecting photograph of a half-decent peel would be better than this one. J Are you green? 05:20, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Obvious Strong Oppose - I quote Edna Mode ( The Incredibles) This is a hobo suit, darling. You can't be seen in this. I won't allow it... Booksworm Talk to me! 17:32, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose! Gak! Maddiekate 03:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Speedy closed, per WP:SNOW... no point wasting any more time on this. -- YFB ¿ 08:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC) Not promoted -- Makeemlighter ( talk) 03:18, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- Expired nomination. Makeemlighter ( talk) 03:18, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- Reason
- Appealing and creative. It makes the reader want to click the picture to learn more.
- Articles this image appears in
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hallucinogenic_effects_of_banana_peels
- Creator
- User:Wallrus
- Support as nominator — Wallrus 04:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
* oppose and speedy close troll nomination.
Debivort
05:03, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- oppose an unappealing portrayal of a marginally unappealing subject. Composition is dull, there could be significantly more detail, particularly on the inside of the peel, and there is poor contrast against the table which has the same hue and detail as the peel. Debivort 05:59, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Very strong oppose Fails almost all FPC and doesn't appear in an article, automatic disqualification. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Clh288 ( talk • contribs).
- To be fair, it was recently added by the nominator to Bananadine. Obviously I otherwise agree with you. Debivort 06:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose Uh...No way. "It makes the reader want to click the picture to learn more." Hahaha, that was funny though. Wikipediarul e s 2221 06:50, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose, horrible nomination.-- Svetovid 08:10, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. Doesn't have appealing (pardon the pun) composition and having it on a brown floor while the peel is browning itself, doesn't make for good contrast. - Mgm| (talk) 08:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose. It's just too ugly and poorly composed. On a white background maybe... Theonlyedge 12:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
-
Oppose - troll. However, it does satisfy one criterion... it's high res! >.< The irony... —
Vanderdecken∴
∫
ξ
φ
17:17, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Extremely Strong Oppose I don't think I need to explain my vote... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BeefRendang ( talk • contribs) 12:34, 11 May 2007 (UTC). J Are you green? 20:48, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Or sign it apparently. Debivort 17:17, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose I'll be blunt - 4 MB of wasted space. At the very least, a poorly composed, poorly set, reflecting photograph of a half-decent peel would be better than this one. J Are you green? 05:20, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Obvious Strong Oppose - I quote Edna Mode ( The Incredibles) This is a hobo suit, darling. You can't be seen in this. I won't allow it... Booksworm Talk to me! 17:32, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose! Gak! Maddiekate 03:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Speedy closed, per WP:SNOW... no point wasting any more time on this. -- YFB ¿ 08:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC) Not promoted -- Makeemlighter ( talk) 03:18, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- Expired nomination. Makeemlighter ( talk) 03:18, 9 April 2012 (UTC)