- Reason
- It is a great, high-resolution image of an aesthetically interesting bridge as seen from a rare angle.
- Articles this image appears in
- BP Pedestrian Bridge
- Creator
- Torsodog
- Support as nominator ---- Torsodog Talk 22:25, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow, even technically not very good, overall nothing special. — αἰτίας • discussion• 22:47, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose the bridge is really nice, and could possibly be a FP by itself, but there's just too much going on in the shot. plus part of the bridge is obscured by trees. Intothewoods29 ( talk) 23:01, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- Comment If you cropped about the top third or top fourth of the image, you'd improve composition a lot - this would also improve quality, as that part is out of focus. However, the tree cutting off part of the bridge is problematic - maybe try in winter or spring, when less foliage? Shoemaker's Holiday ( talk) 15:59, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Very snapshotty. Clegs ( talk) 16:03, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted . -- John254 03:32, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Reason
- It is a great, high-resolution image of an aesthetically interesting bridge as seen from a rare angle.
- Articles this image appears in
- BP Pedestrian Bridge
- Creator
- Torsodog
- Support as nominator ---- Torsodog Talk 22:25, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow, even technically not very good, overall nothing special. — αἰτίας • discussion• 22:47, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose the bridge is really nice, and could possibly be a FP by itself, but there's just too much going on in the shot. plus part of the bridge is obscured by trees. Intothewoods29 ( talk) 23:01, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- Comment If you cropped about the top third or top fourth of the image, you'd improve composition a lot - this would also improve quality, as that part is out of focus. However, the tree cutting off part of the bridge is problematic - maybe try in winter or spring, when less foliage? Shoemaker's Holiday ( talk) 15:59, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Very snapshotty. Clegs ( talk) 16:03, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted . -- John254 03:32, 4 August 2008 (UTC)