Avalon
Good composition and colors. Taken by Aaron Logan and appearing in the article on Avalon, California.
- Nominate and support. - Alr 02:23, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral. Would possibly support a higher resolution image. Its slightly lacking in detail. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 05:01, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral pending support. The hills appear to be washed out and its too low-res. No detail. drumguy8800 - speak? 06:24, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- I'll go with oppose on this one for now. Resolution is far too low for a pano. Also I notice some stitching problems in the lower part. -- Dschwen 13:09, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - Ok composition, size too small. -- Deglr6328 16:37, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose -- This picture is really good, but it is really the sort of picture that really begs for higher resolution. There is so much in the image that I would like to be able to see more clearly. If a high-res version were nominated, I would have to support it. -- jackohare 17:44, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Opppose - it seems to be sloping (look at the sea horizon) and needs 2.5 degrees of counterclockwise rotation. This might seem over fussy but I apply high standards to Featured Pics - Adrian Pingstone 22:19, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - slanting, or is it just an optical illusion? Flcelloguy ( A note?) 01:09, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
I withdraw this nomination in order to avoid unnecessarily prolonging the rejection. However, I continue to stand by the picture as being one of my favorites on Wiki. Alr 01:39, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Withdrawn as per Alr's request. Raven4x4x 05:45, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Avalon
Good composition and colors. Taken by Aaron Logan and appearing in the article on Avalon, California.
- Nominate and support. - Alr 02:23, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral. Would possibly support a higher resolution image. Its slightly lacking in detail. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 05:01, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral pending support. The hills appear to be washed out and its too low-res. No detail. drumguy8800 - speak? 06:24, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- I'll go with oppose on this one for now. Resolution is far too low for a pano. Also I notice some stitching problems in the lower part. -- Dschwen 13:09, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - Ok composition, size too small. -- Deglr6328 16:37, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose -- This picture is really good, but it is really the sort of picture that really begs for higher resolution. There is so much in the image that I would like to be able to see more clearly. If a high-res version were nominated, I would have to support it. -- jackohare 17:44, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Opppose - it seems to be sloping (look at the sea horizon) and needs 2.5 degrees of counterclockwise rotation. This might seem over fussy but I apply high standards to Featured Pics - Adrian Pingstone 22:19, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - slanting, or is it just an optical illusion? Flcelloguy ( A note?) 01:09, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
I withdraw this nomination in order to avoid unnecessarily prolonging the rejection. However, I continue to stand by the picture as being one of my favorites on Wiki. Alr 01:39, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Withdrawn as per Alr's request. Raven4x4x 05:45, 7 January 2006 (UTC)