- Reason
- Looks like a good picture to me. Not at all grainy and meets the size requirement. Hopefully, this one is ok.
- Articles this image appears in
- Arabian Sea, Kannur District, St. Angelo Fort
- Creator
- kjrajesh
- Support as nominator -- Pmlineditor Talk 10:01, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support иιƒкч ? 10:06, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- oppose tonal value has to be corrected – Wladyslaw ( talk) 14:01, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose - Lots of technical problems -- Childzy ¤ Talk 15:36, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose - The bigger it gets, the worse it looks. A good picture taken by a modern camera will look better when enlarged, as the details will "pop." This blurs as it gets bigger. Sorry. Nezzadar ( talk) 03:14, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose - blown highlights, washed out and blurry. MER-C 07:58, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Not promoted -- jjron ( talk) 07:33, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- Reason
- Looks like a good picture to me. Not at all grainy and meets the size requirement. Hopefully, this one is ok.
- Articles this image appears in
- Arabian Sea, Kannur District, St. Angelo Fort
- Creator
- kjrajesh
- Support as nominator -- Pmlineditor Talk 10:01, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support иιƒкч ? 10:06, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- oppose tonal value has to be corrected – Wladyslaw ( talk) 14:01, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose - Lots of technical problems -- Childzy ¤ Talk 15:36, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose - The bigger it gets, the worse it looks. A good picture taken by a modern camera will look better when enlarged, as the details will "pop." This blurs as it gets bigger. Sorry. Nezzadar ( talk) 03:14, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose - blown highlights, washed out and blurry. MER-C 07:58, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Not promoted -- jjron ( talk) 07:33, 8 September 2009 (UTC)