—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Arlen66 ( talk • contribs) 00:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC).
This picture was nominated by Arlen66 ( talk · contribs · count), who also appears to be the photographer. The account was created 00:53, 5 January 2007, precisely 4 minutes before nominating the picture. It has three edits: to the image page, to create this page, and to the main FPC page adding the nom. — Vanderdecken∴ ∫ ξ φ 11:26, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment not sure who nominated or what the story is, but I liked the picture so I photoshopped it and put my version up. Jellocube27 04:28, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
*Support edit 1. This is a great shot. But next time submit your FPC correctly.. --
froth
T
C
03:06, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support Nice shot with no distractions. Like Froth said be sure to read the directions from above when submitting a picture. Why1991 03:28, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose not encyclopedic, beautiful image but is missing one of the key elements. It is not used in "any" article. — Arjun 05:51, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose
SeadogArjun hit it right on the head. The picture, although nice, isn't really encyclopedic at all and it has no article. S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 05:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC) - Oppose per Arjun Glaurung 06:53, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Not a bad photo, but I think I'd have preferred a much closer picture of KataJuta, so that it was the subject and there were less things in the way. A blue sky would also have made it more striking. Terri G 14:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose per Terri G and Arjun. Plus it has visible stitching seams. Looks like an inferior stitching software was used basically just blending the pictures along a vertical strip. -- Dschwen 17:52, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Changed to Oppose, lack of enc -- froth T C 04:37, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Not in any article - Adrian Pingstone 10:51, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Reluctantly since it's a nice shot but it isn't very encyclopedic and fails to be in a single article. Cat-five - talk 10:52, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. Not the best quality and in no article. I'll change to neutral if it is placed in one. Nautica Shad e s 19:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Not promoted Raven4x4x 05:31, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Arlen66 ( talk • contribs) 00:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC).
This picture was nominated by Arlen66 ( talk · contribs · count), who also appears to be the photographer. The account was created 00:53, 5 January 2007, precisely 4 minutes before nominating the picture. It has three edits: to the image page, to create this page, and to the main FPC page adding the nom. — Vanderdecken∴ ∫ ξ φ 11:26, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment not sure who nominated or what the story is, but I liked the picture so I photoshopped it and put my version up. Jellocube27 04:28, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
*Support edit 1. This is a great shot. But next time submit your FPC correctly.. --
froth
T
C
03:06, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support Nice shot with no distractions. Like Froth said be sure to read the directions from above when submitting a picture. Why1991 03:28, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose not encyclopedic, beautiful image but is missing one of the key elements. It is not used in "any" article. — Arjun 05:51, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose
SeadogArjun hit it right on the head. The picture, although nice, isn't really encyclopedic at all and it has no article. S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 05:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC) - Oppose per Arjun Glaurung 06:53, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Not a bad photo, but I think I'd have preferred a much closer picture of KataJuta, so that it was the subject and there were less things in the way. A blue sky would also have made it more striking. Terri G 14:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose per Terri G and Arjun. Plus it has visible stitching seams. Looks like an inferior stitching software was used basically just blending the pictures along a vertical strip. -- Dschwen 17:52, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Changed to Oppose, lack of enc -- froth T C 04:37, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Not in any article - Adrian Pingstone 10:51, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Reluctantly since it's a nice shot but it isn't very encyclopedic and fails to be in a single article. Cat-five - talk 10:52, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. Not the best quality and in no article. I'll change to neutral if it is placed in one. Nautica Shad e s 19:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Not promoted Raven4x4x 05:31, 13 January 2007 (UTC)