Support Looks cool, except for the space dust all over the scan :P
8thstar 21:08, 31 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Support Before anyone says it: It does look like an embryo. Now get over it! :-P --
Arad 21:13, 31 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Support - Clear, beautiful, and very encyclopedic. -
Bluedog423Talk
Support The FPC voters are currently undergoing consensus-building, which will result in the eventual promotion of the pic.--
HereToHelp 22:34, 31 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Support - Very clear picture -
Mrug2 00:40, 1 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Support It does look like an embryo, as noted by Arad. And I love consensus building! Anyways, very nice and encyclopedic pic.
JumpingcheeseCont@ct 22:46, 3 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Support encyclopedic, good quality and interesting. Good for the main page --
Childzy(
Talk|
Contribs) 10:59, 5 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Support Gorgeous. Looks like a fetus to me.
Dliao 04:41, 8 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment. I've corrected the grammar in the caption, and also sharpened the wording a bit.
Chick Bowen 04:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Support Looks cool, except for the space dust all over the scan :P
8thstar 21:08, 31 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Support Before anyone says it: It does look like an embryo. Now get over it! :-P --
Arad 21:13, 31 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Support - Clear, beautiful, and very encyclopedic. -
Bluedog423Talk
Support The FPC voters are currently undergoing consensus-building, which will result in the eventual promotion of the pic.--
HereToHelp 22:34, 31 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Support - Very clear picture -
Mrug2 00:40, 1 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Support It does look like an embryo, as noted by Arad. And I love consensus building! Anyways, very nice and encyclopedic pic.
JumpingcheeseCont@ct 22:46, 3 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Support encyclopedic, good quality and interesting. Good for the main page --
Childzy(
Talk|
Contribs) 10:59, 5 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Support Gorgeous. Looks like a fetus to me.
Dliao 04:41, 8 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment. I've corrected the grammar in the caption, and also sharpened the wording a bit.
Chick Bowen 04:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC)reply