- Reason
- This image provides scale, which is the most important criteria for any Featured Picture ;P
- Articles this image appears in
- yard
- Creator
- Bggoldie
- Support as nominator -- Kaldari ( talk) 22:36, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Obvious technical flaws; useless in terms of scale given the perspective and the fact that the image compares various measurements against each other, something that could be accomplished in a diagram with greater accuracy than rusting metal provides.
68.147.59.209 (
talk)
22:50, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not the IP, but I'll take its place because IP's are not allowed to vote. Oppose per above.
Spencer
T♦
Nominate!
03:59, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- I am the IP and at the time didn't realize I was not logged in, my apologies for this so to clarify Oppose. Cowtowner 17:39, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not the IP, but I'll take its place because IP's are not allowed to vote. Oppose per above.
Spencer
T♦
Nominate!
03:59, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose - No metric equivalents given. 166.77.6.4 ( talk) 23:14, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad crop and composition. And I agree with the 68.147.59.209 that this could be better illustrated by a diagram. -- Muhammad (talk) 00:00, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose because of the angle it was taken from.-- Otterathome ( talk)
- Oppose Scale not in metric units. Noodle snacks ( talk) 07:01, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Weak Support Would be improved by adding scale bar though. Flying Freddy ( talk) 14:26, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose as per all above. The composition just isn't there, and the lighting is poor. J Milburn ( talk) 10:46, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Not promoted -- Makeemlighter ( talk) 22:15, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- Reason
- This image provides scale, which is the most important criteria for any Featured Picture ;P
- Articles this image appears in
- yard
- Creator
- Bggoldie
- Support as nominator -- Kaldari ( talk) 22:36, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Obvious technical flaws; useless in terms of scale given the perspective and the fact that the image compares various measurements against each other, something that could be accomplished in a diagram with greater accuracy than rusting metal provides.
68.147.59.209 (
talk)
22:50, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not the IP, but I'll take its place because IP's are not allowed to vote. Oppose per above.
Spencer
T♦
Nominate!
03:59, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- I am the IP and at the time didn't realize I was not logged in, my apologies for this so to clarify Oppose. Cowtowner 17:39, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not the IP, but I'll take its place because IP's are not allowed to vote. Oppose per above.
Spencer
T♦
Nominate!
03:59, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose - No metric equivalents given. 166.77.6.4 ( talk) 23:14, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad crop and composition. And I agree with the 68.147.59.209 that this could be better illustrated by a diagram. -- Muhammad (talk) 00:00, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose because of the angle it was taken from.-- Otterathome ( talk)
- Oppose Scale not in metric units. Noodle snacks ( talk) 07:01, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Weak Support Would be improved by adding scale bar though. Flying Freddy ( talk) 14:26, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose as per all above. The composition just isn't there, and the lighting is poor. J Milburn ( talk) 10:46, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Not promoted -- Makeemlighter ( talk) 22:15, 2 October 2009 (UTC)