Support as nominator –
PetarM (
talk) 20:35, 15 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Question is this file used in any pages? That is a prerequisite for featured picture status. It is also under the minimum resolution (1500px)
Mattximus (
talk) 21:45, 15 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Agree with Mattximus; this image needs to be in an article. —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 23:24, 15 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Its now in 2 artciles.
Mattximus; photo is full size, just croped so because its panel, very wide compare to height. When they put 1500px limit they probably didnt think on that. --
PetarM (
talk) 04:36, 16 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Support - Owing to the aspect ratio, I think we can allow a small exception for size issues (but yes, there were discussions). This is still 5.79 megapixels. —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 05:48, 16 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Support as nominator –
PetarM (
talk) 20:35, 15 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Question is this file used in any pages? That is a prerequisite for featured picture status. It is also under the minimum resolution (1500px)
Mattximus (
talk) 21:45, 15 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Agree with Mattximus; this image needs to be in an article. —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 23:24, 15 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Its now in 2 artciles.
Mattximus; photo is full size, just croped so because its panel, very wide compare to height. When they put 1500px limit they probably didnt think on that. --
PetarM (
talk) 04:36, 16 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Support - Owing to the aspect ratio, I think we can allow a small exception for size issues (but yes, there were discussions). This is still 5.79 megapixels. —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 05:48, 16 June 2015 (UTC)reply