1993 North American Storm Complex

Cool picture. I think it should be a featured pic.

• Nominate and Support. íslenska hurikein #12 _(samtal) 18:54, 18 June 2006 (UTC) reply
• Oppose Low res, jaggy, and there are already several great (and featured) images of weather systems (setting a calibur this image does not meet). Staxringold _talk ^contribs 19:46, 18 June 2006 (UTC) reply

Can't the low res and jaggedness problem be fixed? íslenska hurikein #12 _(samtal) 23:13, 18 June 2006 (UTC) reply

Probably not, unless a better version of the original image is found, otherwise there's almost nothing that can be done to improve the quality. -- Pharaoh Hound 00:04, 19 June 2006 (UTC) reply

• Oppose per Staxringold. However, would be glad to support

1. an image with better resolution, or

2. even better, a high-resolution visible image —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Runningonbrains ( talk • contribs) .

• Oppose.-- as per reasons state above. Geoffrey Gibson 04:19, 20 June 2006 (UTC) reply
• Oppose - I personally don't like using GIFs for anything except animation, ergo I don't support. Plus I wouldn't exactly call it stunning or massively informative. — Vanderdecken∴ ∫ ξ φ 15:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC) reply
• Support I like it, its easy to read and interpret. TomStar81 20:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC) reply
• Oppose - Not a very good quality and we get dozens of storms every year -- BWF89 22:56, 22 June 2006 (UTC) reply
• Strong Oppose - There have already been too many featured articles on storms. Unless they are culturally or historically significant... leave 'em off the main page. - OldMajor 02:01, 23 June 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - read the article. This storm is very historically significant. It was also named the storm of the century. íslenska hurikein #12 _(samtal) 14:20, 23 June 2006 (UTC) reply
• Oppose. I personally hate infrared satellite imagery. Hurricanehink ( talk) 02:45, 25 June 2006 (UTC) reply

Not promoted Raven4x4x 04:48, 27 June 2006 (UTC) reply