The list was kept by Dabomb87 01:24, 14 October 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
This list was brought up in a question during the recent FLRC delegate election, and it struck me as failing to meet modern FL standards. It has been nominated previously, and the FLRC resulted in a rare no-consensus decision. The primary issue there was the scope of the list, which is not my main concern. I have one comment on it below, but there are other pressing matters as well:
If you need a model, List of Birmingham City F.C. players looks like a good list to follow, though the inclusion criteria is different. Giants2008 ( 17–14) 14:45, 27 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment I'm about ready to close this FLRC—good work to all. Can reviewers double check to make sure this meets all criteria? Dabomb87 ( talk) 23:40, 6 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Keep – Quickly checked the list again, and the criteria all appear to be met. Chris did a great job fixing the list up. Giants2008 ( 17–14) 01:15, 7 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:38, 10 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The list was kept by Dabomb87 01:24, 14 October 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
This list was brought up in a question during the recent FLRC delegate election, and it struck me as failing to meet modern FL standards. It has been nominated previously, and the FLRC resulted in a rare no-consensus decision. The primary issue there was the scope of the list, which is not my main concern. I have one comment on it below, but there are other pressing matters as well:
If you need a model, List of Birmingham City F.C. players looks like a good list to follow, though the inclusion criteria is different. Giants2008 ( 17–14) 14:45, 27 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment I'm about ready to close this FLRC—good work to all. Can reviewers double check to make sure this meets all criteria? Dabomb87 ( talk) 23:40, 6 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Keep – Quickly checked the list again, and the criteria all appear to be met. Chris did a great job fixing the list up. Giants2008 ( 17–14) 01:15, 7 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:38, 10 October 2009 (UTC) reply