Still a Featured list
Promoted ages ago. This is not a featured list for these reasons: Of the links, one third are red, which is too many; at least one section with prose needs a copyedit; what is included in the list implies the non-existence of other possible teams; it appears not to have been updated. Nominate for demotion.
Miss Madeline |
Talk to Madeline
22:21, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Remove, was done for Sri Lanka and India. -- ALoan (Talk) 14:46, 14 February 2006 (UTC)Still think it should be removed if it is not updated. -- ALoan (Talk) 09:51, 26 February 2006 (UTC)- Keep now updated - thanks Sam Vimes. -- ALoan (Talk) 17:29, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Remove per all reasons stated above.-- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 12:48, 18 February 2006 (UTC)- Comment. Perhaps someone has been working on the red-link because I only count 4 out of 24 captains in red - much less than the claimed one-third and a small number in itself. Reason 3 and 4 may be valid, though. Rmhermen 04:57, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
- I just checked and some of the missing articles were created last week as stubs. Thanks for bringing this up. -- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 18:01, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Neutral now. Some links have been redded and a copyedit was done, although one section still needs updating and there are no explicit answers to point 3.Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 18:22, 21 February 2006 (UTC)- Comment. This is an interesting situation. Should a list be demoted if it hasn't been updated? I'm inclined to say yes it should. However, given that the list is apparently being worked on, I say we give this nomination one more week. --
Run
e
Welsh |
ταλκ
17:06, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
- Updated now. Sam Vimes 16:58, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Still a Featured list
Promoted ages ago. This is not a featured list for these reasons: Of the links, one third are red, which is too many; at least one section with prose needs a copyedit; what is included in the list implies the non-existence of other possible teams; it appears not to have been updated. Nominate for demotion.
Miss Madeline |
Talk to Madeline
22:21, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Remove, was done for Sri Lanka and India. -- ALoan (Talk) 14:46, 14 February 2006 (UTC)Still think it should be removed if it is not updated. -- ALoan (Talk) 09:51, 26 February 2006 (UTC)- Keep now updated - thanks Sam Vimes. -- ALoan (Talk) 17:29, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Remove per all reasons stated above.-- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 12:48, 18 February 2006 (UTC)- Comment. Perhaps someone has been working on the red-link because I only count 4 out of 24 captains in red - much less than the claimed one-third and a small number in itself. Reason 3 and 4 may be valid, though. Rmhermen 04:57, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
- I just checked and some of the missing articles were created last week as stubs. Thanks for bringing this up. -- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 18:01, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Neutral now. Some links have been redded and a copyedit was done, although one section still needs updating and there are no explicit answers to point 3.Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 18:22, 21 February 2006 (UTC)- Comment. This is an interesting situation. Should a list be demoted if it hasn't been updated? I'm inclined to say yes it should. However, given that the list is apparently being worked on, I say we give this nomination one more week. --
Run
e
Welsh |
ταλκ
17:06, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
- Updated now. Sam Vimes 16:58, 27 February 2006 (UTC)