The article was kept by Dana boomer 14:39, 13 January 2011 [1].
Welding ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
FA from 2005, FA criteria concerns, including 1c, and referencing issues. After bringing up the issue at the article's talk page, the original FAC nominator was amenable to the article being nominated for FAR. Total of (11) images used in the article, these could use an image review check. Might help to have the lede/intro expanded a bit more, to more fully function as a standalone summary of the entire article's contents, per WP:LEAD. There are a few short paragraphs and overly short subsections. Overall, the main issue is referencing throughout. -- Cirt ( talk) 17:25, 8 November 2010 (UTC) reply
I made changes that I felt warranted the removal of all the {{ fact}} tags that Cirt added to the "Process" section of the article. If similar changes were made throughout the article, would this be satisfactory? -- Spangineer ws (háblame) 17:01, 1 December 2010 (UTC) reply
The article was kept by Dana boomer 14:39, 13 January 2011 [1].
Welding ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
FA from 2005, FA criteria concerns, including 1c, and referencing issues. After bringing up the issue at the article's talk page, the original FAC nominator was amenable to the article being nominated for FAR. Total of (11) images used in the article, these could use an image review check. Might help to have the lede/intro expanded a bit more, to more fully function as a standalone summary of the entire article's contents, per WP:LEAD. There are a few short paragraphs and overly short subsections. Overall, the main issue is referencing throughout. -- Cirt ( talk) 17:25, 8 November 2010 (UTC) reply
I made changes that I felt warranted the removal of all the {{ fact}} tags that Cirt added to the "Process" section of the article. If similar changes were made throughout the article, would this be satisfactory? -- Spangineer ws (háblame) 17:01, 1 December 2010 (UTC) reply