The article was kept 18:42, 30 September 2007.
Nominating due to criterion 1c, no inline cites. --
RelHistBuff
15:10, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
Comment: I did nominate the article, but at the time there was an overload of articles in the FAR process so I withdrew it temporarily. Since it has been renominated, I will give more details about the 1c criterion problem. The prose contain certain passive constructions such as
These should reworded and/or cited. Also the quote should have a cite. There are clearly elements of a historian's analysis such as
These should be cited to give credit to the historian that did the analysis. Otherwise it looks like original research. -- RelHistBuff 13:49, 21 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Keep the good work! Marskell 09:08, 10 September 2007 (UTC) reply
Keep: Good save! It’s a completely different article now. I see some minor issues, but not enough to defeature. -- RelHistBuff 16:36, 19 September 2007 (UTC) reply
The article was kept 18:42, 30 September 2007.
Nominating due to criterion 1c, no inline cites. --
RelHistBuff
15:10, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
Comment: I did nominate the article, but at the time there was an overload of articles in the FAR process so I withdrew it temporarily. Since it has been renominated, I will give more details about the 1c criterion problem. The prose contain certain passive constructions such as
These should reworded and/or cited. Also the quote should have a cite. There are clearly elements of a historian's analysis such as
These should be cited to give credit to the historian that did the analysis. Otherwise it looks like original research. -- RelHistBuff 13:49, 21 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Keep the good work! Marskell 09:08, 10 September 2007 (UTC) reply
Keep: Good save! It’s a completely different article now. I see some minor issues, but not enough to defeature. -- RelHistBuff 16:36, 19 September 2007 (UTC) reply