- The following is an archived discussion of a
featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at
Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was kept by
Dana boomer 13:31, 13 October 2010
[1].
Selena (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views)
- Notified:
Secret,
AJona1992,
Explicit,
WikiProject Mexican-Americans,
WikiProject Texas,
WikiProject Biography,
WikiProject Musicians
This is a featured article from 2006 but I don't think that it currently meets the criteria. Specifically, I think there are problems with:
- 1a) I'm not an expert on prose but it's not the usual standard required at FAC now;
- 1c) Some more inline citations are needed. One example - the fact that Jennifer Lopez playing Selena stirred up controversy, but was accepted by fans - this is not sourced. Dubious sources are used, for example a user-submitted biography at IMDb.
- 1d) Not sure about this, because I don't know much about the subject, and maybe there's nothing negative to say about her, but it does seem to have a somewhat positive slant to it
- 2c) Citation formats are inconsistent, with some bare URLs. There are several dead links in the references.
- 3) There seem to be problems with two of the images. If in fact they are ok and verified by OTRS, then presumably the non-free image used would not qualify as fair use.
--
Beloved
Freak
20:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
reply
- What makes the following sources reliable?
Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (
Many otters •
One bat •
One hammer)
21:00, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
reply
- First off Q-Productions is Selena's ONLY official web site since Selena's family don't give two f's about the fans thats what we have. "Selena Forever" is a fan site that includes information from NEWSPAPERS, MAGAZINES, TV SHOWS, ETC., and theres footnotes. (AJona1992)
I'm going to revert to the last FA version before the fancruft was added, it would take away a year worth of edits, but it's worth it. Any objections?
Secret
account
19:54, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
reply
-
I give up with the article, I want it to go directly to FAR unless someone is up to the challege, i wont work on it until much later in the year
Secret
account
22:54, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Hi Secret - I just wanted to let you know that your message has been received. Articles are usually left in the FAR portion of the page for two weeks (which would make it August 31), and then if no work is happening, are moved to the FARC section for another two weeks. This should allow enough time for another editor to step up if they wish, or if you find you have more time, then you may of course step back up and the process can be extended. We are always willing to give articles a bit more time if they are being actively worked upon, as the point of this process is to improve the articles, rather than quickly delisting them.
Dana boomer (
talk)
01:25, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Why are you going to give up on this article? I mean I wouldn't mind it being a FFA because everyone is always negative about my edits to that page. It's like the article CANNOT be expanded which is stupid I can't add footnotes to it so what else is there to do? Maybe once this article is a FFA is when this article can be a featured article, Secret you really don't know that much about her I mean when I joined here the article was like a stub to me! Why onle include a basic knowledge about her? why only have less than 1,000 bytes in the lead when we all know (by my recent edits) that she has done WAY MORE? why not include her "stage" section as she is very known to wear stylist outfits? I mean I am happy that this article is going to be a FFA because its then that this article will have all the detials like Michael Jackson but every time I bring that up all I get is a revert to it. So I won't give up but I don't want this article to be a FA I'm sorry.
AJona1992 (
talk)
03:38, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Excuse me? "fancrut" really? maybe you should leave! That information is true just because the information was given by magazines, and tv specials doesnt mean that its false or as you say "fancrut". Good-bye hahahaha
AJona1992 (
talk)
03:41, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
reply
- I already did, you guys love deleting her images fine go and do that while I'lljust keep 'trying and tryingand trying again. Oh wow you found it on Selenaforever.com oh theres WAY more websites that used the photos as well, like I said to the previous deleter, just by searching on google.com and finding the same exact picture doesn't mean I just took it.
AJona1992 (
talk)
16:30, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Comment regarding criterion three:
- I don't see any problem with the plaque, yes the statue is a derivative work but a plaque? Are you sure about this?
Secret
account
20:14, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
reply
- I sent out the OTRS letter if you didn't get it oh well not my problem.
- "Nonesense" don't try coming at me because I don't play fair you DA. HAHAHAHA you just look stupid by saying something so retarted hahahaha.
AJona1992 (
talk)
16:30, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Who are you talking to now?--
Beloved
Freak
16:54, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
reply
- To you (look at your last message here) and to this DA guy/girl or w.e it is.
AJona1992 (
talk)
16:56, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Ok, well I don't know what a DA is, I'm not "coming at you" and I'm not sure what "retarted" thing I have said, but I think you should perhaps slow down your editing on
Selena a bit and try to get to know the
FA criteria a bit better, and listen to people's concerns here. Hopefully the article can be improved so that it can stay an FA, but adding text that violates copyright isn't going to do it.--
Beloved
Freak
18:52, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Nope I am not going to "slow down" I have done that before and look where it got me. I don't want this article to be a FA right now, there's too many rules about FA's that its stupid. I disagree in having the article 'Selena' being a FA article. Because its then when us fans who have more knowledge about her can be left alone.
AJona1992 (
talk)
21:00, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
reply
There are also three red links in this article:
- Please read
WP:RED; redlinks are not a problem if the articles meet notability, and are not a valid oppose at FAC or FAR.
SandyGeorgia (
Talk)
12:11, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Oops, my bad, I will remember it next time.
JJ98 (
Talk)
20:08, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Oh so its ok for you to cite sources with books but I'm not allowed? Wow that's so pathetic. I'm not allowed but yet your allowed oh wow. You guys are so lucky I'm not an admin because what BLOCKED BLOCKED BLOCKED BLOCKED lolz BLOCKED BLOCKED BLOCKED.
AJona1992 (
talk)
23:51, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
reply
- AJona, who told you that books are not allowed to be cited as sources? Because that is patently not true. Books are often preferred as sources on many subjects - just look at many recents FAs, especially on historical subjects: they are loaded with book sources.
Dana boomer (
talk)
11:03, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
reply
- I'm already starting to source, I ordered the book in my local library hopefully it would come. Thanks
Secret
account
18:02, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
reply
Comment I don't see the book by Patoski being added anywhere in the reference. We need the full author name, title, year, isbn, publisher, pages etc. I would also suggest a timeline splitting of the article, as par with the FAs of musician articles like
Michael Jackson,
Madonna,
Janet Jackson,
Aaliyah etc. Please change wordings like "was #75" to "was number 75". "3x Platinum by" to "Three-times platinum". Otherwise a quite well kept article and I would support its keep. —
Legolas
(talk2me)
09:55, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
-
Featured article criterion of concern are prose, referencing, copyright
YellowMonkey (
new photo poll)
01:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
Delist. Agree with FA criteria concerns, above issues unaddressed, also issues of possible comprehensiveness, short paragraphs, poor sourcing and unsourced chunks. --
Cirt (
talk)
16:43, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- I'm still waiting to get the book from my local library, I ordered it last week, but it haven't arrived. I'm not an expert in prose, so I need the time and the help to keep it as an FA.
Secret
account
16:58, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Delist no major expansion of the article, still references needed and also a major problem that this article is only written in basics and not informative for other people, this article needs major work but I am not willing to and have not been editing it since the controversy of me editing since, how Secret put it "fan crap or crub", so for that I let those people edit the article.
AJona1992 (
talk)
20:41, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- The article doesn't need a major expansion it just needs the sourcing from books and newspapers.
Secret
account
20:43, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Comment a FA article shouldn't be short, basic, and not informative point blank Secret as you can tell how the article looks like. Theres TONS of more information that can be added there WAY MORE but the ONLY way I can do so is if this article is delisted, all you guys have been editing is basic information on her, as we can tell I can write a very good article for example "
Amor Prohibido (song)" I re-wrote that article in less than a day! But when it comes to "Selena" all I get is reverted even if I have a RS, point blank delist this article because all it has is basic information on her, I can re-write this article with all the books, magazines, newspapers, CDs, concerts and so on forth for this article that it can be as big as Michael Jackson and other well known famous entertainers. But I am not going to do so now because it will only get me a revert and me being banned from editing.
AJona1992 (
talk)
20:51, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- I'm not banning you from working in the article, you were just using
unreliable sources, if you could find reliable sources, you could work on the article as free as you wish I need your help.
Secret
account
14:11, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Reviewing the talk page, the article's history, and the disruption at the article from AJona1992, I suggest this delist be ignored, and hope that the disruption will end soon so the article can be unprotected.
SandyGeorgia (
Talk)
12:09, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: I want to tell you off so freaking bad but I am going to tell you this, I am the type of guy that you don't want to cross. I added sources from the magazine if you don't have the magazine then shut up and stop accusing becuz you are not doing nothing to a address the issues above, stop crying about old shit and get over it.
AJona1992 (
talk)
01:16, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- You won't be cut off, but I moved it as there hadn't been anything happening for about 12 days and no reason given. No need to panic
YellowMonkey (
new photo poll)
01:22, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Ok thanks, I'll get the book today and work with the article.
Secret
account
14:09, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- I got the book hopefully I could start working on it tonight.
Secret
account
22:49, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
Delist concerns not addressed. Ten Pound Hammer,
his otters and a clue-bat • (
Otters want attention)
00:35, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Keep lots of work has been done by Secret. Ten Pound Hammer,
his otters and a clue-bat • (
Otters want attention)
01:01, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Keep (although I'm not sure about comprehensiveness), a lot of good work has been done to address the concerns.--
Beloved
Freak
10:25, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: Still seeing short paragraph, two-sentence-long-paragraph in subsection After death. Also, can we come up with some better title for that subsection, rather than, After death? --
Cirt (
talk)
14:28, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Hold up you asked for my help and this is what all my magazines are telling me go cry to them and try to throw me under the bus oh well if the magazine says she sold more than 200 million then so be it, if the magazine said the funeral held more than 100 million so be it, so argue with them and not talk s about me.
AJona1992 (
talk)
22:56, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
Article is currently protected due to disputes; citations need cleanup:
See
WP:MOS#ALLCAPS, missing date, inconsistent citation style, pls review others. Portals are not External links; see
WP:LAYOUT.
SandyGeorgia (
Talk)
04:25, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: Selena was in the music world for 15 years. She has done a lot, you just don't have any knowledge about her. Secondly no I disagree its reasonable to have that there esp if its in every Selena related book.
AJona1992 (
talk)
01:48, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Can you point to where the extra information can be found?
YellowMonkey (
new photo poll)
01:56, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- "TV Y Novelas, April 2005" (magazine), "Biography: Selena" (TV special), and "Amor Prohibido (special) 2006"
AJona1992 (
talk)
01:58, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- His unreliable sources like 100 million people went to her funeral, I got the biography written about Selena, everything that should be mentioned, is mentioned.
Secret
account
02:00, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- id you mean "Joe Nick Patoski. Selena Como La Flor. Little Brown and Company. p. 30.
ISBN
0316693782. ? It has at least 288 pages
YellowMonkey (
new photo poll)
04:29, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- 269 not including the references sections, most of the beginning is family background, and alot of background information, the book itself for me is lacking, and outdated.
Secret
account
04:49, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Here we go again another attack. It's a MAGAZINE get over it, do I have to show pictures on GOOGLE or send you pictures of the magazine and inside since you do not understand that it is a magazine about her, just becuz you don't own it doesn't mean it's real.
AJona1992 (
talk)
02:08, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- The magazine is
unreliable, showing your 100 million people attended her funeral, and 200 million album sales (only done by Celine Dion) edits show.
Secret
account
02:11, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- There's no rule that states that magazine is unreliable. If you have a problem with the magazine YOU should take it upon them and not on me. I am not the author nor publisher.
AJona1992 (
talk)
02:14, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Some magazines are reliable, is just because of those statements, yours are clearly not, your wasting my time.
Secret
account
02:16, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- So then why bother with me? I wasn't even talking to you in the first place. I listen to you when you said that the magazine was a lie I did not add any source from it. But yet your still here talking about me and the magazine like if I am the editor of it and I planned to disrupt articles and this site. All you do here is mouth about us Selena fans that we are adding fan crap and junk on this article, you have the OWN issues with the article. I only edit it if I find information from Billboard magazine. But oh yea I forgot its a FA so I am not allowed to edit it becuz every time I do it gets reverted becuz you guys just can't seem to think that a beautiful Mexican American star like Selena can have titles like those mentioned.
AJona1992 (
talk)
02:21, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- AJona1992, you don't seem to understand
featured article crit 1c; if you think the source is reliable only because it's a magazine, please take it to
WP:RSN.
SandyGeorgia (
Talk)
02:38, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Well no one told about that at all. Everyone is just dead against me on editing the page. We all know
Billboard is reliable but yet revert it? I just don't get it and yet I am the one who is targeted.
AJona1992 (
talk)
02:43, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- Well you didn't add a billboard magazine source, you added your tv documentaries and telenovela gossip magazine (which is far from a reliable source, my mom reads it so I perfectly know the source).
Secret
account
02:48, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- At the time no, but we was talking what I added on the lead section for Selena about her having the most successful songs in 1994 and 1995 her being called "best Latin artist of the decade" and "Best 1990s singer". And it got reverted (hidden) and it was all coming from a source "Billboard" so point taken even if I added a source from RIAA that Selena sold over 100 millions records (just saying here) it would STILL get reverted even if the RIAA confirmed it that's my concern with you guys.
AJona1992 (
talk)
02:54, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
- This conversation doesn't belong here: please continue it on your talk.
SandyGeorgia (
Talk)
03:51, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
reply
STatus?
YellowMonkey (
new photo poll)
00:29, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
reply
- There's no concerns for now, and if there is I will fix them on the spot.
Secret
account
01:23, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.