The article was kept by User:Marskell 10:34, 23 June 2008 [1].
This article seems to be a generally good article overall, but is lacking in several ways:
The prose problems appear to be the most significant issue, though the others should be fixed as well. Pyrospirit ( talk · contribs) 22:59, 22 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Considering the principle editor is recused, [2] and prose issues are the only concerns, is this a good use of FAR or could this work be accomplished on the article talk page? SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 03:11, 23 June 2008 (UTC) reply
The article was kept by User:Marskell 10:34, 23 June 2008 [1].
This article seems to be a generally good article overall, but is lacking in several ways:
The prose problems appear to be the most significant issue, though the others should be fixed as well. Pyrospirit ( talk · contribs) 22:59, 22 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Considering the principle editor is recused, [2] and prose issues are the only concerns, is this a good use of FAR or could this work be accomplished on the article talk page? SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 03:11, 23 June 2008 (UTC) reply