The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 08:35, 21 May 2009 [1].
As much as I love this film, the article has some problems. The article is missing citations om some major sections such as "Acting Style". There is only one citation in Casting as well. Several sections I think could use some more inline citations.
According to WP:FILMPLOT the film's plot should be shorter (between 400 and 700 words), where here it is over 900 words (I've taken out reference texts as well.) The film here also cites imdb five times which is not a reliable source and shouldn't be seen on a Featured Article. It also doesn't feature much in ways of Wikipedia:Featured article criteria. The lead should be expanded more as it doesn't go into scale of the production, themes, etc.
A lot of work was put into this article, but Ran could use some work here to be improved upon. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 00:11, 21 April 2009 (UTC) reply
FilmReference.com provides a list of resources, including books and articles, here. Considering the age of the film, it is likely that we will find the best resources in print and not online, so heavier research may be necessary. This is another good list, too. — Erik ( talk • contrib) 16:28, 22 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 08:35, 21 May 2009 [1].
As much as I love this film, the article has some problems. The article is missing citations om some major sections such as "Acting Style". There is only one citation in Casting as well. Several sections I think could use some more inline citations.
According to WP:FILMPLOT the film's plot should be shorter (between 400 and 700 words), where here it is over 900 words (I've taken out reference texts as well.) The film here also cites imdb five times which is not a reliable source and shouldn't be seen on a Featured Article. It also doesn't feature much in ways of Wikipedia:Featured article criteria. The lead should be expanded more as it doesn't go into scale of the production, themes, etc.
A lot of work was put into this article, but Ran could use some work here to be improved upon. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 00:11, 21 April 2009 (UTC) reply
FilmReference.com provides a list of resources, including books and articles, here. Considering the age of the film, it is likely that we will find the best resources in print and not online, so heavier research may be necessary. This is another good list, too. — Erik ( talk • contrib) 16:28, 22 April 2009 (UTC) reply