The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 01:49, 11 November 2010 [1].
Radhanite ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I feel that this article fails criteria 1b and 1c. Concerning 1b, the article is simply not long or detailed enough to cover five hundred years of trade history.
In short, the article simply does not meet Wikipedia's FA criteria because it lacks the breadth and depth of coverage, and it does not significantly represent modern scholarship on the issue. Jan 1922 ( talk) 19:03, 13 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 01:49, 11 November 2010 [1].
Radhanite ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I feel that this article fails criteria 1b and 1c. Concerning 1b, the article is simply not long or detailed enough to cover five hundred years of trade history.
In short, the article simply does not meet Wikipedia's FA criteria because it lacks the breadth and depth of coverage, and it does not significantly represent modern scholarship on the issue. Jan 1922 ( talk) 19:03, 13 October 2010 (UTC) reply