The article was removed 14:39, 20 January 2007.
The main reason I am nominating this article for FAR is not by far because I would like it delisted. I am an avid Olympics page editor, and I think that this page may be falling behind, and I would hate to lose it as a FA, as the Summer Olympics page did. I am looking to see what specifically could be changed, both content-wise and aesthetically, because I think that would help the page. I just saw that this page had never been listed as one of "Today's Featured Articles" and I was shocked, and that's what initiated this request. I hope to see some very helpful feedback that editors can look back on for guidance! → JARED (t) 21:13, 12 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Comment: This has also received some work. Moving down as it's been up a while. Marskell 07:36, 2 January 2007 (UTC) reply
Remove—1a and 2a. The lead is scrappy, and its prose exemplifies a generally poor standard of writing throughout.
The article was removed 14:39, 20 January 2007.
The main reason I am nominating this article for FAR is not by far because I would like it delisted. I am an avid Olympics page editor, and I think that this page may be falling behind, and I would hate to lose it as a FA, as the Summer Olympics page did. I am looking to see what specifically could be changed, both content-wise and aesthetically, because I think that would help the page. I just saw that this page had never been listed as one of "Today's Featured Articles" and I was shocked, and that's what initiated this request. I hope to see some very helpful feedback that editors can look back on for guidance! → JARED (t) 21:13, 12 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Comment: This has also received some work. Moving down as it's been up a while. Marskell 07:36, 2 January 2007 (UTC) reply
Remove—1a and 2a. The lead is scrappy, and its prose exemplifies a generally poor standard of writing throughout.