The article was kept by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 3:09, 9 October 2021 (UTC) [1].
I am nominating this featured article for review because the article has become bloated, with multiple short paragraphs that need to be merged or deleted. The article has an extensive "Further Reading" section, whose works should be included in the article or not listed if they are not high-quality sources. After comparing the current article to the promoted version from 2009, I see sources were added to "Works Cited" that might not be the highest quality; considering the amount of literature on this person, the article can remove less reputable sources that might be acceptable in other FA articles. Z1720 ( talk) 16:09, 24 July 2021 (UTC) reply
The article was kept by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 3:09, 9 October 2021 (UTC) [1].
I am nominating this featured article for review because the article has become bloated, with multiple short paragraphs that need to be merged or deleted. The article has an extensive "Further Reading" section, whose works should be included in the article or not listed if they are not high-quality sources. After comparing the current article to the promoted version from 2009, I see sources were added to "Works Cited" that might not be the highest quality; considering the amount of literature on this person, the article can remove less reputable sources that might be acceptable in other FA articles. Z1720 ( talk) 16:09, 24 July 2021 (UTC) reply