The article was removed by User:Dana boomer 16:31, 14 May 2013 [1].
This article, which passed FAC in 2007 and had a minimal FAR in 2009, no longer meets the FA criteria, specifically:
I have raised many of these concerns at the talk page and they have not been addressed in two weeks, so I am nominating here. Rs chen 7754 19:23, 25 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Comments—
As for the lead, I have not read the full article, but I will take the nominator's concerns there on good faith. The other MOS issues need to be corrected as well. In short, I agree with the nomination here. The article needs to be repaired in the formatting department to justify retention of the FA label. If that was all that was needed, I would volunteer my time and assistance to help, but the research issues give me greater concern. At this time, I won't spend energy polishing an article back to modern expectations and requirements of a FA only to have half or more of the article gutted over source issues. Imzadi 1979 → 21:51, 25 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The article was removed by User:Dana boomer 16:31, 14 May 2013 [1].
This article, which passed FAC in 2007 and had a minimal FAR in 2009, no longer meets the FA criteria, specifically:
I have raised many of these concerns at the talk page and they have not been addressed in two weeks, so I am nominating here. Rs chen 7754 19:23, 25 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Comments—
As for the lead, I have not read the full article, but I will take the nominator's concerns there on good faith. The other MOS issues need to be corrected as well. In short, I agree with the nomination here. The article needs to be repaired in the formatting department to justify retention of the FA label. If that was all that was needed, I would volunteer my time and assistance to help, but the research issues give me greater concern. At this time, I won't spend energy polishing an article back to modern expectations and requirements of a FA only to have half or more of the article gutted over source issues. Imzadi 1979 → 21:51, 25 March 2013 (UTC) reply