The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 4:07, 15 January 2022 (UTC) [1].
I was granted permission by Nikkimaria to take this one to FAR only two weeks after the notice, as this is a bit of a special case. The original FAC nominator is banned, and was found to have had a history of hoaxing/fake references. When looking into this one, I detected two instances of failed verification while checking only a single small part of the article. While the failed verification text has since been removed, it had been in the article at the time of the FAC. Given the history of the nominator and the fact that I didn't check most of the article, that is cause for concern.
Aside from the potential verifiability issues, there is also uncited text, heavy use of the state legal code where secondary sources would be better, and a weighting issue, as the 2009 election is given more detail that the next three put together. Hog Farm Talk 22:46, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 4:07, 15 January 2022 (UTC) [1].
I was granted permission by Nikkimaria to take this one to FAR only two weeks after the notice, as this is a bit of a special case. The original FAC nominator is banned, and was found to have had a history of hoaxing/fake references. When looking into this one, I detected two instances of failed verification while checking only a single small part of the article. While the failed verification text has since been removed, it had been in the article at the time of the FAC. Given the history of the nominator and the fact that I didn't check most of the article, that is cause for concern.
Aside from the potential verifiability issues, there is also uncited text, heavy use of the state legal code where secondary sources would be better, and a weighting issue, as the 2009 election is given more detail that the next three put together. Hog Farm Talk 22:46, 24 December 2021 (UTC) reply