The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 6:15, 4 February 2017 (UTC) [1].
I am nominating this featured article for review because it doesn't meet today's FA standards. Dr. Blofeld previously started two threads about how the article wasn't up to par, and I can't say these have really been fulfilled. Details to follow. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 01:07, 11 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Here is what I find when comparing this article to the FA criteria:
This clearly is going to take some work to salvage, and the promoted version doesn't look much better even if FA standards weren't so strict back in 2008 when it passed FAC. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 03:46, 11 January 2017 (UTC) reply
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 6:15, 4 February 2017 (UTC) [1].
I am nominating this featured article for review because it doesn't meet today's FA standards. Dr. Blofeld previously started two threads about how the article wasn't up to par, and I can't say these have really been fulfilled. Details to follow. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 01:07, 11 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Here is what I find when comparing this article to the FA criteria:
This clearly is going to take some work to salvage, and the promoted version doesn't look much better even if FA standards weren't so strict back in 2008 when it passed FAC. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 03:46, 11 January 2017 (UTC) reply