The article was kept by User:Marskell 10:28, 21 August 2008 [1].
This article was promoted to FA status in December 2004 and has not been reviewed. The article may have met the FA criteria back then, but it doesn't meet the current criteria. Criterion 1(c) seems to be the biggest problem for this article. There has been a "nofootnotes" tag on it since May. Halgin ( talk) 00:20, 1 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Images
Close. My and the nominator's comments appear to have been addressed. DrKiernan ( talk) 07:25, 20 August 2008 (UTC) reply
The article was kept by User:Marskell 10:28, 21 August 2008 [1].
This article was promoted to FA status in December 2004 and has not been reviewed. The article may have met the FA criteria back then, but it doesn't meet the current criteria. Criterion 1(c) seems to be the biggest problem for this article. There has been a "nofootnotes" tag on it since May. Halgin ( talk) 00:20, 1 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Images
Close. My and the nominator's comments appear to have been addressed. DrKiernan ( talk) 07:25, 20 August 2008 (UTC) reply