The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 02:09, 26 July 2010 [1].
Iranian peoples ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
This is a 2006 FA that has not been reviewed since the month of its promotion. There are numerous issues that need to be addressed for this article to remain at FA status, mainly regarding prose and referencing:
I have noted the two above (prose and under-referencing) that are the biggest problems. Dana boomer ( talk) 01:28, 30 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Lots of things are wrong with this article. If I didn't know the FA process is completely broken I would be wondering how it ever became FA.
First of all, the map is an abomination. I made an effort to replace it with an overview map working as a thumbnail, but this failed due to ethnic bickering so I gave up on it. As long as we don't replace this with something acceptable I don't think anything else needs to be discussed. But there is lots to discuss then. So there is a "Genetics" h2 section, with a "Genetic roots" subsection. Huh? There is a "diversity" h2(!) section that more or less consists of a random comment. There is a "Etymology and usage" with the main article Arya#Etymology, and then there is another(!) h2 section called "Self designator as Arya". I could go on. What this article badly needs is attention from an experienced editor. I have tried to give it such attention in the past, but the usual Iranian ethnic chauvinism going on on talkpage quickly convinced me I was wasting my time. Actually, I do wonder how this was ever smuggled through FAC. -- dab (𒁳) 10:19, 30 June 2010 (UTC) reply
The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 02:09, 26 July 2010 [1].
Iranian peoples ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
This is a 2006 FA that has not been reviewed since the month of its promotion. There are numerous issues that need to be addressed for this article to remain at FA status, mainly regarding prose and referencing:
I have noted the two above (prose and under-referencing) that are the biggest problems. Dana boomer ( talk) 01:28, 30 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Lots of things are wrong with this article. If I didn't know the FA process is completely broken I would be wondering how it ever became FA.
First of all, the map is an abomination. I made an effort to replace it with an overview map working as a thumbnail, but this failed due to ethnic bickering so I gave up on it. As long as we don't replace this with something acceptable I don't think anything else needs to be discussed. But there is lots to discuss then. So there is a "Genetics" h2 section, with a "Genetic roots" subsection. Huh? There is a "diversity" h2(!) section that more or less consists of a random comment. There is a "Etymology and usage" with the main article Arya#Etymology, and then there is another(!) h2 section called "Self designator as Arya". I could go on. What this article badly needs is attention from an experienced editor. I have tried to give it such attention in the past, but the usual Iranian ethnic chauvinism going on on talkpage quickly convinced me I was wasting my time. Actually, I do wonder how this was ever smuggled through FAC. -- dab (𒁳) 10:19, 30 June 2010 (UTC) reply