The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 02:05, 9 June 2009 [1].
OK, I saw that there is some activity on WP:Volcanoes, so might be a good time to spruce up the referencing. It has a total of 7 inline refs and an ugly tag that I cannot remove at the top. Should be relatively straightforward. I will tag (i.e. criterion 1c) and notify parties. Casliber ( talk · contribs) 09:42, 13 May 2009 (UTC) reply
I'd add some concerns about accuracy and comprehensiveness, although these are hopefully fairly minor. For instance, the "third of all the basaltic lava" statistic seems wrong, concerns about placename translations expressed on the talk page have not been addressed, and the volcanological content seems a bit light. -- Avenue ( talk) 01:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 02:05, 9 June 2009 [1].
OK, I saw that there is some activity on WP:Volcanoes, so might be a good time to spruce up the referencing. It has a total of 7 inline refs and an ugly tag that I cannot remove at the top. Should be relatively straightforward. I will tag (i.e. criterion 1c) and notify parties. Casliber ( talk · contribs) 09:42, 13 May 2009 (UTC) reply
I'd add some concerns about accuracy and comprehensiveness, although these are hopefully fairly minor. For instance, the "third of all the basaltic lava" statistic seems wrong, concerns about placename translations expressed on the talk page have not been addressed, and the volcanological content seems a bit light. -- Avenue ( talk) 01:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC) reply