The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 2:13, 19 December 2020 (UTC) [1].
I am nominating this featured article for review because it no longer meets Wikipedia:Featured article criteria. There are unsourced paragraphs, unsourced statements, unattributed quotes, weasel words without attribution, a section consisting largely of quotes, inconsistent citation styles and short, stubby paragraphs that do not meet the prose criterion. DrKay ( talk) 15:16, 22 November 2020 (UTC) reply
These statement issues have been identified through an AI that can automatically identify statements having minor POV issues and missing citations. It is meant to ease the review burden for Featured Articles. If such predictions are relevant, we appreciate more feedback here to help evaluate our AI and make it robust to aid in article reviews. More details can be found on the research page. Sumit ( talk) 05:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply
Ditto with "great numbers"; just stating the number doesn't make it clear that in relation to the population at the time this was a significant proportion (nowadays, 100,000 people at a London event wouldn't be particular significant). It seems to me like you're looking for what you consider weasel words, without bothering to check if they're appropriate in context. ‑ Iridescent 06:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply
Move to FARC, no engagement. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 07:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 2:13, 19 December 2020 (UTC) [1].
I am nominating this featured article for review because it no longer meets Wikipedia:Featured article criteria. There are unsourced paragraphs, unsourced statements, unattributed quotes, weasel words without attribution, a section consisting largely of quotes, inconsistent citation styles and short, stubby paragraphs that do not meet the prose criterion. DrKay ( talk) 15:16, 22 November 2020 (UTC) reply
These statement issues have been identified through an AI that can automatically identify statements having minor POV issues and missing citations. It is meant to ease the review burden for Featured Articles. If such predictions are relevant, we appreciate more feedback here to help evaluate our AI and make it robust to aid in article reviews. More details can be found on the research page. Sumit ( talk) 05:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply
Ditto with "great numbers"; just stating the number doesn't make it clear that in relation to the population at the time this was a significant proportion (nowadays, 100,000 people at a London event wouldn't be particular significant). It seems to me like you're looking for what you consider weasel words, without bothering to check if they're appropriate in context. ‑ Iridescent 06:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply
Move to FARC, no engagement. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 07:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC) reply