The article was kept by User:Marskell 17:40, 19 July 2008 [1].
This remains a well written, stable and (likely) accurate article, however it lacks a good lead, is too short and has a critical lack of citations, both inline and not.
The nominating user Matt Crypto, WP version 0.5 and Wikiproject Cryptography have each been notified of this discussion. Cumulus Clouds ( talk) 17:23, 11 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Good work, Hut. Do you feel that it is fully referenced (i.e., that each ref covers everything behind it until the preceeding ref)? And no, there is no length criterion; the question is whether it is comprehensive, regardless of length. Is Cumulus still around? Perhaps we can close this without FARC. Marskell ( talk) 15:16, 30 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments:
I agree. It remains a tidy little article. Great work from Hut. Marskell ( talk) 17:05, 19 July 2008 (UTC) reply
The article was kept by User:Marskell 17:40, 19 July 2008 [1].
This remains a well written, stable and (likely) accurate article, however it lacks a good lead, is too short and has a critical lack of citations, both inline and not.
The nominating user Matt Crypto, WP version 0.5 and Wikiproject Cryptography have each been notified of this discussion. Cumulus Clouds ( talk) 17:23, 11 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Good work, Hut. Do you feel that it is fully referenced (i.e., that each ref covers everything behind it until the preceeding ref)? And no, there is no length criterion; the question is whether it is comprehensive, regardless of length. Is Cumulus still around? Perhaps we can close this without FARC. Marskell ( talk) 15:16, 30 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments:
I agree. It remains a tidy little article. Great work from Hut. Marskell ( talk) 17:05, 19 July 2008 (UTC) reply