The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 5:58, 25 July 2020 (UTC) [1].
I am nominating this featured article for review because it was highlighted for deficiencies, such as "considerable amounts of uncited text", back in January 2020 and these issues have not been resolved. b uidh e 01:02, 23 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Comment The sourcing is clearly not of FA standard:
Comment: The article has not kept up with the times as can be seen here: "Featured article review needed". The issues are too extensive to be able to fix them quickly. -- K.e.coffman ( talk) 02:44, 25 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Comment: I concur, this is not up to current FA standard.
The amount of work that will be required to resolve all the issues will be a significant undertaking. Zawed ( talk) 23:54, 26 June 2020 (UTC) reply
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 5:58, 25 July 2020 (UTC) [1].
I am nominating this featured article for review because it was highlighted for deficiencies, such as "considerable amounts of uncited text", back in January 2020 and these issues have not been resolved. b uidh e 01:02, 23 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Comment The sourcing is clearly not of FA standard:
Comment: The article has not kept up with the times as can be seen here: "Featured article review needed". The issues are too extensive to be able to fix them quickly. -- K.e.coffman ( talk) 02:44, 25 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Comment: I concur, this is not up to current FA standard.
The amount of work that will be required to resolve all the issues will be a significant undertaking. Zawed ( talk) 23:54, 26 June 2020 (UTC) reply