The article was removed by Dana boomer 14:39, 10 May 2011 [1].
I am nominating this featured article for review because I believe it no longer meets FA criteria 1(c) well-researched (Claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate).
The article passed for FA in 2006 when the FAC process was fairly lenient. After a thorough read, I found it well-written but inadequately sourced. Many citations are present at the end of a paragraph, leaving preceding sentences practically unsourced. A sample of my concerns:
Additionally, many citations are retrieved from fansites, such as Hall's fansite anthonymichaelhall.net, John Hughes's fansite "Shermer, Illinois" and Hughes's tribute site http://www.riverblue.com/hughes/trivia1.html.
Based on the above-mentioned issues, I officially nominate this article for FAR.
-- Artoasis ( talk) 05:37, 11 April 2011 (UTC) reply
The article was removed by Dana boomer 14:39, 10 May 2011 [1].
I am nominating this featured article for review because I believe it no longer meets FA criteria 1(c) well-researched (Claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate).
The article passed for FA in 2006 when the FAC process was fairly lenient. After a thorough read, I found it well-written but inadequately sourced. Many citations are present at the end of a paragraph, leaving preceding sentences practically unsourced. A sample of my concerns:
Additionally, many citations are retrieved from fansites, such as Hall's fansite anthonymichaelhall.net, John Hughes's fansite "Shermer, Illinois" and Hughes's tribute site http://www.riverblue.com/hughes/trivia1.html.
Based on the above-mentioned issues, I officially nominate this article for FAR.
-- Artoasis ( talk) 05:37, 11 April 2011 (UTC) reply