The article was kept by DrKiernan via FACBot ( talk) 6:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC) [1].
This is a 2006 promotion from the Unreviewed Featured Articles list that had fallen below standard, but whose FAC nominator Avraham engaged on talk to address issues raised with a substantial rewrite. After significant improvements and updates, I am bringing it to FAR for more eyes; it is my expectation that the article will likely be Kept without FARC, but more feedback is welcome. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 01:57, 17 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Comment - I feel like the quality of citations and possibly comprehensiveness should be scrutinized further. For example, I looked at the "Need for insurance" heading and the lone citation is to p. 3 of a presentation by Lewin. There isn't a whole lot of text on p. 3 of that PDF, and not everything in that heading is supported. This indicates the need for further spot-checks to ensure everything is sourced. The "Credentialing and exams" heading seems rather light on information, alluding to different systems of requirements in different countries but not providing much detail. Many other sections seem too brief. I'll do another read-through and make a tentative list of suggested expansions, but I'd like to here Avraham's thoughts on the comprehensiveness. -- Laser brain (talk) 13:32, 13 June 2015 (UTC) reply
I just have a couple of queries, which I have tagged in the article [2] [3]. Thanks, DrKiernan ( talk) 12:49, 25 August 2015 (UTC) reply
The article was kept by DrKiernan via FACBot ( talk) 6:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC) [1].
This is a 2006 promotion from the Unreviewed Featured Articles list that had fallen below standard, but whose FAC nominator Avraham engaged on talk to address issues raised with a substantial rewrite. After significant improvements and updates, I am bringing it to FAR for more eyes; it is my expectation that the article will likely be Kept without FARC, but more feedback is welcome. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 01:57, 17 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Comment - I feel like the quality of citations and possibly comprehensiveness should be scrutinized further. For example, I looked at the "Need for insurance" heading and the lone citation is to p. 3 of a presentation by Lewin. There isn't a whole lot of text on p. 3 of that PDF, and not everything in that heading is supported. This indicates the need for further spot-checks to ensure everything is sourced. The "Credentialing and exams" heading seems rather light on information, alluding to different systems of requirements in different countries but not providing much detail. Many other sections seem too brief. I'll do another read-through and make a tentative list of suggested expansions, but I'd like to here Avraham's thoughts on the comprehensiveness. -- Laser brain (talk) 13:32, 13 June 2015 (UTC) reply
I just have a couple of queries, which I have tagged in the article [2] [3]. Thanks, DrKiernan ( talk) 12:49, 25 August 2015 (UTC) reply